Objective: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ASP8477 in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP).
Design: Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal.
Setting: Centers in Poland (four), Czech Republic (six), and the United Kingdom (two).
Subjects: Patients aged 18 years or older with PNP resulting from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia.
Methods: A four-week screening period followed by a single-blind period (six-day dose titration and three-week maintenance period with ASP8477 [20/30 mg BID]). Treatment responders (defined as a ≥30% decrease in the mean average daily pain intensity during the last three days of the single-blind period) were stratified by disease and randomized to receive placebo or continue ASP8477 during a three-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period. The primary end point was change in mean 24-hour average numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) from baseline to end of double-blind period.
Results: Among 132 patients who enrolled, 116 entered the single-blind period and 63 (ASP8477, N = 31; placebo, N = 32) completed the double-blind period. There was no difference in mean 24-hour average NPRS score (P = 0.644) or in time-to-treatment failure (P = 0.485) between ASP8477 and placebo. During the single-blind period, 57.8% of patients were treatment responders. ASP8477 was well tolerated. During the single-blind period, 22% of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TEAE); during the double-blind period, 8% in the ASP8477 arm and 18% in the placebo arm experienced at least one TEAE.
Conclusions: ASP8477 was well tolerated in patients with PNP; however, ASP8477 did not demonstrate a significant treatment difference compared with placebo.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939857 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx046 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!