All-Polyethylene Tibial Component Use for Elderly, Low-Demand Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

J Arthroplasty

Bridger Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Bozeman, Montana.

Published: August 2017

Background: Potential advantages combined with lower cost have prompted a renewed interest in modern all-polyethylene tibial designs.

Methods: A total of 317 Natural Knee total knee arthroplasties with an all-polyethylene tibial component that was performed since 1993 were retrospectively reviewed to confirm that cost savings were not associated with inferior clinical results. They were primarily used in elderly, low-demand patients. The average age at the time of surgery was 80.8 years.

Results: 227 knees with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified. The average follow-up was 5.6 years (range, 2-20 years). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. At the latest follow-up, the average Knee Society and functional score was 94.2 and 57.2. The average postoperative range of motion was 1.6°-115.4°. No patient required a revision for aseptic or septic loosening, wear, or instability. Only 5 knees had a partial nonprogressive cement/bone radiolucency. There was an approximate 33% cost savings for the implants when the all-polyethylene component was used.

Conclusion: An all-polyethylene tibial component of this design provides excellent results in the elderly population along with a significant cost savings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.077DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

all-polyethylene tibial
16
tibial component
12
cost savings
12
elderly low-demand
8
total knee
8
all-polyethylene
5
component
4
component elderly
4
low-demand total
4
knee
4

Similar Publications

Metal-backed versus all-poly tibia in the original cartier unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes and survivorship at long-term follow-up.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

December 2024

Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.

Purpose: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option for localized osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis with several advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). UKA implants may feature a tibial component either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB). This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of 74 UKAs over 16 years, focusing on comparing the results and survivorship of MB versus AP tibial tray.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of post-operative outcomes following TKA with an all-polyethylene tibial (APT) or a metal-backed tibial component (MBT). A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify all studies comparing APT and MBT for TKA based upon rates of complications, revisions, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes. Data was pooled and relative risk of each outcome measure at short (< 5 year), mid (5-10 year), and long (> 10 year) follow-up was calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Polyethylene wear in metal-backed tibial components in unicompartmental knee prostheses.

J ISAKOS

December 2024

Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH164SA, UK.

The utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased worldwide and has become a favourable alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with isolated single-compartment knee osteoarthritis. With the increase in UKA utilization, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The two most common causes of revision are the progression of osteoarthritis in other compartments and aseptic loosening with polyethylene wear, with other common causes for revision including periprosthetic fracture, bearing dislocation, infection, instability and unexplained pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This retrospective study compares the outcomes of unicompartmental medial fixed-bearing knee arthroplasty (mUKA), involving a cemented metal-backed (MB) or an all-polyethylene (AP) tibial component, performed in obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 with a follow-up of at least 5 years.

Methods: The institutional database was mined for primary mUKAs involving an MB or an AP tibial component (MB-UKA and AP-UKA groups, respectively) performed from January 2015 to August 2019. Patient demographics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared and a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis (1:1) using multiple variables was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!