A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

An analysis of patient-provider secure messaging at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers: message content and resolution through secure messaging. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed secure messaging (SM) communication between patients and primary care teams at two VA facilities, focusing on message threads.
  • Most messages (94.5%) were initiated by patients (90.4%), primarily addressing medication renewals, scheduling, and health issues, while only a small percentage (5.5%) came from healthcare teams.
  • A significant number of issues (24.2%) were unresolved through SM, indicating that improvements in communication training for both patients and providers could enhance the overall interaction and resolution of concerns.

Article Abstract

Objective: We sought to understand how patients and primary care teams use secure messaging (SM) to communicate with one another by analyzing secure message threads from 2 Department of Veterans Affairs facilities.

Methods: We coded 1000 threads of SM communication sampled from 40 primary care teams.

Results: Most threads (94.5%) were initiated by patients (90.4%) or caregivers (4.1%); only 5.5% were initiated by primary care team members proactively reaching out to patients. Medication renewals and refills (47.2%), scheduling requests (17.6%), medication issues (12.9%), and health issues (12.7%) were the most common patient-initiated requests, followed by referrals (7.0%), administrative issues (6.5%), test results (5.4%), test issues (5.2%), informing messages (4.9%), comments about the patient portal or SM (4.1%), appreciation (3.9%), self-reported data (2.8%), life issues (1.5%), and complaints (1.5%). Very few messages were clinically urgent (0.7%) or contained other potentially challenging content. Message threads were mostly short (2.7 messages), comprising an average of 1.35 discrete content types. A substantial proportion of issues (24.2%) did not show any evidence of being resolved through SM. Time to response and extent of resolution via SM varied by message content. Proactive SM use by teams varied, but was most often for test results (32.7%), medication-related issues (21.8%), medication renewals (16.4%), or scheduling issues (18.2%).

Conclusions: The majority of messages were transactional and initiated by patients or caregivers. Not all content categories were fully addressed over SM. Further education and training for both patients and clinical teams could improve the quality and efficiency of SM communication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

secure messaging
12
primary care
12
message content
8
message threads
8
initiated patients
8
medication renewals
8
issues
8
content
5
patients
5
analysis patient-provider
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!