Replies to comments by Muralidharan et al (see record 2017-13255-009) on the original article by Silver and Nemec (see record 2016-43088-001). The original authors thank the commentators for raising additional questions regarding "peerness." They were honored that their paper prompted this thought and effort to submit comments. (PsycINFO Database Record
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0101580 | DOI Listing |
BMC Geriatr
May 2022
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Room 520, 5/F., The Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Background: There is an ample body of literature examining the experiences and outcomes of peer support services for mental health recovery in western countries. However, formal peer support is only recently adapted and piloted to alleviate depression among older people, and little is known about how the peer-to-peer model might be lived out in the older Chinese population. This qualitative study investigated peer supporters' (PS) perspectives of their roles and experiences of rendering formal peer support to community-dwelling older adults at risk of or living with depression in Hong Kong.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatr Rehabil J
June 2018
Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School of Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Topic: This article addresses critical considerations in the development of peer supports for parents with mental illnesses, focusing on the question of what makes a peer a peer in the parent peer specialist domain.
Purpose: The implementation and testing of parent peer supports requires specification of the critical components of the model, including the qualities, characteristics, and unique contributions of the parent peer specialist.
Sources Used: Themes emerged in Parent Peer Specialist Project Advisory Group discussions, with members drawing from lived experience, practice expertise, and conversations with experts.
Reports an error in "Defining "peerness" in peer-delivered health and wellness interventions for serious mental illness": Response to letter to the editor" by Jody Silver and Patricia B. Nemec (, 2017[Mar], Vol 40[1], 116). The article was mislabeled as Editorial and should be a Comment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReplies to comments by Muralidharan et al (see record 2017-13255-009) on the original article by Silver and Nemec (see record 2016-43088-001). The original authors thank the commentators for raising additional questions regarding "peerness." They were honored that their paper prompted this thought and effort to submit comments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatr Rehabil J
March 2017
VISN 5 MIRECC, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System.
Comments on the original article by Silver and Nemec (see record 2016-43088-001) regarding the recent special issue on peer-delivered services. Silver and Nemec thoughtfully raised important topics for further explanation. Especially intriguing was their commentary on what constitutes "essential peerness"; that is, what qualities or experiences are necessary/sufficient to make a peer a peer? With this editorial, the authors add to that conversation, specifically with regard to the role of peer specialists in health/wellness interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!