[Is endovenous thrombolysis safety and efficacy in ischemic stroke comparable between patients aged over and above 80 years? Experience from an Argentinean cohort].

Introduction: Enrollment of patients aged above 80 years in trials assessing endovenous thrombolysis (rt-PA) was scarce. The goal of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of endovenous rt-PA between patients aged above 80 and those below 80 years.

Patients And Methods: A cohort of patients who received rt-PA was prospectively followed. Length of hospital stay, bleeding incidence, in-hospital mortality and 90 days' clinical outcome was compared between patients aged above 80 and those below 80 years.

Results: Of 1996 patients admitted at our hospital with ischemic stroke between October 2005 and January 2016, 180 received rt-PA (9%). Mean age was 77 ± 10 years, being 55% of the women. Comparing patients aged above 80 with those below 80 years, in the latter the length of hospital stay was longer with a median length of 15 days (IQR: 6-19) vs 7 days (IQR: 4-12; p = 0.001) and 90 days' clinical outcome was worse (modified Rankin scale 0-1 of 24% vs 41%; p = 0.001). Admission ASPECTS score, bleeding incidence and in-hospital mortality showed no significant differences between both groups. Patients aged over 80 arrived to the hospital earlier (97 ± 34 vs 113 ± 45 min; p = 0.01), however door-to-needle time was longer.

Conclusions: Endovenous thrombolysis in patients aged above 80 years was safe, although its efficacy in assuring a better clinical outcome was not as pronounced as in patients below 80 years.