AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three diagnostic methods—fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and resting distal coronary artery pressure/aortic pressure (Pd/Pa)—against N-ammonia PET imaging to detect myocardial ischemia in patients with left anterior descending artery stenosis.
  • A total of 115 patients underwent both N-ammonia PET and invasive assessments, with results showing that while all methods correlated with PET-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) and relative flow reserve (RFR), their overall diagnostic accuracy for CFR and RFR was similar.
  • FFR, however, outperformed resting indices in distinguishing and reclassifying ischemia when using RFR as a

Article Abstract

Objectives: The authors sought to compare the diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and resting distal coronary artery pressure/aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) using N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).

Background: The diagnostic performance of invasive physiological indices was reported to be different according to the reference to define the presence of myocardial ischemia.

Methods: A total of 115 consecutive patients with left anterior descending artery stenosis who underwent both N-ammonia PET and invasive physiological measurement were included. Optimal cutoff values and diagnostic performance of FFR, iFR, and resting Pd/Pa were assessed using PET-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) and relative flow reserve (RFR) as references. To compare discrimination and reclassification ability, each index was compared with integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and category-free net reclassification index (NRI).

Results: All invasive physiological indices correlated with CFR and RFR (all p values <0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracies of FFR, iFR, and resting Pd/Pa were not different for CFR <2.0 (FFR 69.6%, iFR 73.9%, and resting Pd/Pa 70.4%) and RFR <0.75 (FFR 73.9%, iFR 71.3%, and resting Pd/Pa 74.8%). Discrimination and reclassification abilities of invasive physiological indices were comparable for CFR. For RFR, FFR showed better discrimination and reclassification ability than resting indices (IDI = 0.170 and category-free NRI = 0.971 for iFR; IDI = 0.183 and category-free NRI = 1.058 for resting Pd/Pa; all p values <0.001).

Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of invasive physiological indices showed no differences in the prediction of myocardial ischemia defined by CFR. Using RFR as a reference, FFR showed a better discrimination and reclassification ability than resting indices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic performance
16
invasive physiological
16
physiological indices
12
flow reserve
12
n-ammonia positron
8
positron emission
8
emission tomography
8
ifr resting
8
diagnostic
4
performance resting
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!