A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Is the SenseWear Armband accurate enough to quantify and estimate energy expenditure in healthy adults? | LitMetric

Is the SenseWear Armband accurate enough to quantify and estimate energy expenditure in healthy adults?

Ann Transl Med

Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre ("i+12"), Madrid, Spain;; Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; GENUD research group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain;; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Spain;; Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Zaragoza, Spain.

Published: March 2017

Background: The SenseWear Armband (SWA) is a monitor that can be used to estimate energy expenditure (EE); however, it has not been validated in healthy adults. The objective of this paper was to study the validity of the SWA for quantifying EE levels.

Methods: Twenty-three healthy adults (age 40-55 years, mean: 48±3.42 years) performed different types of standardized physical activity (PA) for 10 minutes (rest, walking at 3 and 5 km·h, running at 7 and 9 km·h, and sitting/standing at a rate of 30 cycle·min). Participants wore the SWA on their right arm, and their EE was measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) the gold standard.

Results: There were significant differences between the SWA and IC, except in the group that ran at 9 km·h (>9 METs). Bland-Altman analysis showed a BIAS of 1.56 METs (±1.83 METs) and limits of agreement (LOA) at 95% of -2.03 to 5.16 METs. There were indications of heteroscedasticity (R =0.03; P<0.05). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the SWA seems to be not sensitive enough to estimate the level of EE at highest intensities.

Conclusions: The SWA is not as precise in estimating EE as IC, but it could be a useful tool to determine levels of EE at low intensities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360603PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.02.31DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensewear armband
8
estimate energy
8
energy expenditure
8
healthy adults
8
armband accurate
4
accurate quantify
4
quantify estimate
4
expenditure healthy
4
healthy adults?
4
adults? background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!