Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of femtosecond laser and excimer laser on an intracorneal inlay (KAMRA) implanted in animal models.
Methods: Femtosecond laser was used to create corneal intrastromal pockets at 250μm depth in five porcine eyes. Four intact KAMRA inlays, examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and light microscopy, were implanted in the pocket of four eyes. A standard LASIK flap was created above each implanted inlay in the four eyes using a femtosecond laser with flap thicknesses of 150μm, 130μm, 110μm and 90μm. In the fifth porcine eye, a LASIK flap was created using femtosecond laser at 110μm depth, and a fifth inlay was then implanted in the 250μm pocket. Excimer laser ablation was performed under the flap targeting a -3.00 refraction. The inlay was then explanted, examined and reimplanted in the same pocket followed by a second similar excimer laser ablation.
Results: Significant burn, shrinkage and distortion of microholes were noted in all the first four inlays following the femtosecond laser flap creation at all the various flap thicknesses. The damage was noted to be more prominent as the distance between the flap and inlay decreased. No apparent effect was noted on the fifth inlay following repeated excimer laser ablations.
Conclusion: Unlike excimer laser, femtosecond laser appears to be hazardous and damaging to the intracorneal KAMRA inlay when applied above it.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2016.11.011 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!