AI Article Synopsis
- The authors believe that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) have valuable suggestions, but their criticism of Levin and Banaji's research from 2006 is not justified.
- They assert that F&S are overly skeptical about the influence of top-down effects when compared to other theories regarding perceptual intelligence.
- Overall, the text highlights a disagreement on the validity of F&S's critique and their approach to understanding perceptual processes.
Article Abstract
We argue that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) provide worthwhile recommendations but that their critique of research by Levin and Banaji (2006) is unfounded. In addition, we argue that F&S apply unjustified level of skepticism about top-down effects relative to other broad hypotheses about the sources of perceptual intelligence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002642 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
cognition affect
4
affect perception
4
perception restating
4
restating evidence
4
evidence top-down
4
top-down argue
4
argue firestone
4
firestone scholl
4
scholl f&s
4
f&s provide
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!