Frisch and Earp, opponents of male circumcision, have criticized draft recommendations from the CDC that advocate counseling men and parents of newborn boys in the United States about the benefits and risks of male circumcision. We provide a rebuttal to Frisch and Earp's criticisms and contend that the recommendations are entirely appropriate and merit consideration for policy development.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478224 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00390 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
male circumcision
12
cdc's male
4
circumcision recommendations
4
recommendations represent
4
represent key
4
key public
4
public health
4
health measure
4
measure frisch
4
frisch earp
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!