AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined various catheters used for less invasive surfactant therapy (LIST) and compared their effectiveness to endotracheal tubes (ETT) among neonatologists.
  • 20 neonatologists simulated procedures on manikins, and the effectiveness was measured by procedure duration and failure rates, with feeding tubes being significantly slower and more difficult to use.
  • Results showed that only rigid or stylet-guided catheters matched the intubation speed of ETT, and respondents found these options easier to use compared to feeding tubes.

Article Abstract

Aim: Different catheters can be used for less invasive surfactant therapy (LIST): feeding tubes inserted with or without Magill forceps, different angiocatheters and centre specific devices, such as umbilical catheters affixed to a stylet. This study compared the effectiveness of LIST devices and endotracheal tubes (ETT).

Methods: Video recordings of 20 neonatologists simulating different LIST techniques on two manikin heads were analysed. Procedural effectiveness was evaluated by the duration of procedures and failure rates. Ease of use was scored.

Results: The median procedure time for the Neonatal Intubation Trainer was significantly longer with feeding tubes without Magill forceps. For the more difficult ALS Baby Trainer, successful procedures lasted a median of 24 (17-32) seconds with ETT, 24 (15-36) seconds with stylet-guided catheters and 34 (27-46) seconds and 37 (29-42) seconds with 13-cm and 30-cm angiocatheters, respectively. Both methods using feeding tubes were statistically slower than ETT intubation, lasting 32 (25-44) seconds and 39 (27-95) seconds with or without Magill forceps. Failure rates (7-20%) were no different between the LIST methods. Techniques using feeding tubes were rated as more difficult.

Conclusion: Only rigid or stylet-guided catheters required tracheal catheterisation times similar to those of endotracheal intubation and neonatologists found them easier.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13850DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

feeding tubes
16
magill forceps
12
invasive surfactant
8
surfactant therapy
8
failure rates
8
stylet-guided catheters
8
seconds
6
tubes
5
rigid catheters
4
catheters reduced
4

Similar Publications

Background: Enteral feeding tubes, used in patients who require enteral nutrition or medication, require flushing between medications and feedings to maintain patency. Various types of water can be used to flush enteral feeding tubes, which raises the question of which type of water is best supported by evidence.

Purpose: The aims of this quality improvement project were to examine the evidence on the use of tap water instead of sterile water for enteral tube flushes and to implement the use of tap water as a safe, cost-effective alternative to sterile water at a multisite oncology institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) pose a significant risk in the home health environment, where patients may lack continuous professional oversight. Devices commonly used in the home environment with the potential to cause a MDRPI include but are not limited to nasogastric tubes, feeding tubes, nasal cannulas, nasal cannula prongs, airway pressure masks, indwelling urinary catheters, sequential compression devices, dressings, bandages, and tracheostomies. When a medical device is used for an extended period, it can lead to unrelieved pressure or edema, cause friction and/or shearing that impairs sensation, reduces circulation, and alters the microclimate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To describe feeding outcomes in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and compare characteristics and outcomes in groups discharged home on oral, total/partial nasogastric, and gastrostomy-tube feedings.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study of infants diagnosed with moderate or severe HIE using standard criteria who underwent cooling from January 2017 to June 2022. Data were abstracted from hospital course as well as until 6 months follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of two in vitro methods progressed in a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to determine amino acid digestibility of feed ingredients for yellow-feathered roosters.

Poult Sci

December 2024

The State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address:

This experiment compared amino acid (AA) digestibility assessed by 2 in vitro methods using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system and in vivo assay for corn, soybean meal, casein, corn gluten meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal and a corn-soybean meal diet. In vitro method 1 simulated gizzard digestion at pH 2.0, followed by small intestinal digestion, and the subsequent clearance of the digested product from dialysis tubing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Are enteral devices risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections in children with intestinal failure?

Clin Nutr

December 2024

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Cincinnati Center of Excellence for Intestinal Rehabilitation (CinCEIR), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address:

Background & Aims: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) represent one of the most common and serious complications in children with intestinal failure (IF). This study aimed to assess if there is an association between the use of enteral devices (feeding tubes and stomas) with rate of CLABSI after adjusting for clinically relevant factors. Second, association between enteral devices with time to first CLABSI event was evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!