The Duration of Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support and Length of Hospital Stay of Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Cardiol Res

Department of Internal Medicine, Pinnacle Health Systems, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17104, United States of America.

Published: August 2012

Background: To evaluate the impact of duration of Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) on hospitalization of patients after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There has been a continuous increase in prevalence of coronary artery disease with more patients needing PCI during acute myocardial infarction. Some of these patients have to undergo high-risk revascularization with circulatory support like the Impella 2.5 device.

Methods: This study was a single center retrospective study of patients admitted to our hospital who required Impella circulatory support during percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients' medical records, cardiac catheterization laboratory and 2-D echocardiography reports were reviewed to ascertain left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of Impella support, Coronary Care Unit (CCU) days and the length of stay in the hospital. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Over a 15-month period, we had 25 patients with 19 males and 6 females. Mean age of the patient cohort was 68 ± 10 years. Mean LVEF of the group was 32 ± 16%. Mean length of hospital stay was 8 ± 8 days and mean CCU stay was 4 ± 4 days. The Impella was successfully inserted in all cases with a median duration of support of 70 minutes (range, 4 - 5760 minutes). Bleeding complication occurred in 8%. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the duration of Impella support and hospital stay was 0.49 (P = 0.023) while it was 0.71 (P = 0.001) between Impella support duration and CCU days.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that there is a positive correlation between the duration of Impella 2.5 circulatory support and hospital stay and/or CCU days. The correlation seems to be stronger with CCU days.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358206PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/cr190eDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

duration impella
20
circulatory support
16
hospital stay
16
impella support
16
impella circulatory
12
percutaneous coronary
12
ccu days
12
support
9
length hospital
8
high-risk percutaneous
8

Similar Publications

Background: Limited data is available regarding in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) with Impella with and without a prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: We performed a retrospective study from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from year 2016 to 2020. We identified patients who underwent Impella and percutaneous coronary intervention on the same day and excluded those with cardiogenic shock.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Extended Duration Bridge to Orthotopic Heart Transplant Utilizing the Impella RP Flex.

ASAIO J

December 2024

From the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

We present a case of a 56 year old man presenting with cardiogenic shock from isolated right ventricular failure due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy who was successfully bridged to heart transplantation after 29 days on an Impella RP Flex right ventricular assist device. This represents the longest reported duration of support with the device to date and highlights the utility of this platform in the management of severe right ventricular failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Left ventricular unloading by percutaneous microaxial flow-pump devices has been shown to improve survival in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The objective of the study is to examine whether Impella 5.0/5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the use of cangrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who also have cardiogenic shock (CS), focusing on the infusion duration and transition to oral medications.
  • A total of 249 patients with CS were analyzed, with significant observations on demographics, infusion times, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding risks.
  • The findings showed that patients with CS had longer cangrelor infusions compared to others, and that the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was linked to longer infusion times and an increased risk of bleeding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Impella 5.5® is commonly inserted via the axillary artery (AX) in patients with cardiogenic shock. The right AX has traditionally been preferred to avoid crossing the aortic arch, and a minimum diameter of 7 mm has been recommended to accommodate the device (21 Fr).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!