Objectives: During laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery (LACS), precise recognition of the anatomic variations and relationships among tumor and vessels is required. However, in highly obese patients, it is more difficult to grasp the surgical anatomy due to the presence of dense mesenteric fat tissue. We utilized a 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructed image for preoperative simulation and intraoperative navigation for LACS. In this study, we examined the correlation between patient obesity and 3D-simulated perioperative outcomes.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who underwent LACS using 3D surgical simulation at Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital. We sequentially divided our cohort into 2 groups: patients with a low body mass index (BMI<25 kg/m, n=60) and patients with a high BMI (BMI ≥25 kg/m, n=64). Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes, including conversion rate, postoperative complications, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay, were compared for these 2 groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient background between the 2 groups.We found it more difficult to grasp the surgical anatomy, including vessel arrangement, for high-BMI patients than for low-BMI patients because of the dense mesenteric fat tissue in high-BMI patients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to perioperative outcomes.

Conclusions: The utilized reconstructed 3D images were useful for understanding anatomic relationships, including vessel arrangement, during LACS, particularly in highly obese patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic-assisted colorectal
8
colorectal surgery
8
highly obese
8
obese patients
8
impact laparoscopic-assisted
4
surgery 3-dimensional
4
3-dimensional reconstruction
4
reconstruction highly
4
patients
4
patients colorectal
4

Similar Publications

Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred method for treating colorectal disease. Laparoscopic suturing is complex, and barbed sutures (BS) can improve the process by eliminating the need for surgical knots and constant traction on the suture line. This study compares intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery (LCS) with anastomosis using BS and conventional sutures (CS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is the most widely used abdominal field block in colorectal surgery with a postoperative enhanced recovery pathway. We aimed to determine whether the laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) blocks provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. We separately investigated whether the laparoscopic-assisted technique was non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided technique in providing pain relief, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mg morphine dose equivalents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Robotic-assisted complete mesorectal excision (RATME) is increasingly being used by colorectal surgeons. Most surgeons consider RATME a safe method, and believe it can facilitate total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer, and may potentially have advantages over intersphincteric resection (ISR) and anus preservation. Therefore, this trial was designed to investigate whether RATME has technical advantages and can increase the ISR rate compared with laparoscopic-assisted TME (LATME) in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!