Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To determine whole-brain cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO ), an improved imaging approach, based on radial encoding, termed radial OxFlow (rOxFlow), was developed to simultaneously quantify draining vein venous oxygen saturation (SvO ) and total cerebral blood flow (tCBF).
Methods: To evaluate the efficiency and precision of the rOxFlow sequence, 10 subjects were studied during a paradigm of repeated breath-holds with both rOxFlow and Cartesian OxFlow (cOxFlow) sequences. CMRO was calculated at baseline from OxFlow-measured data assuming an arterial O saturation of 97%, and the SvO and tCBF breath-hold responses were quantified.
Results: Average neurometabolic-vascular parameters across the 10 subjects for cOxFlow and rOxFlow were, respectively: SvO (%) baseline: 64.6 ± 8.0 versus 64.2 ± 6.6; SvO peak: 70.5 ± 8.5 versus 72.6 ± 5.4; tCBF (mL/min/100 g) baseline: 39.2 ± 3.8 versus 40.6 ± 8.0; tCBF peak: 53.2 ± 5.1 versus 56.1 ± 11.7; CMRO (µmol O /min/100 g) baseline: 111.5 ± 26.8 versus 120.1 ± 19.6. The above measures were not significantly different between sequences (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: There was good agreement between the two methods in terms of the physiological responses measured. Comparing the two, rOxFlow provided higher temporal resolution and greater flexibility for reconstruction while maintaining high SNR. Magn Reson Med 79:217-223, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612835 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26666 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!