Prospective microbiologic evaluation of the forceps elevator in closed-channel duodenoscopes after reprocessing.

Am J Infect Control

Department of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Control, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Published: February 2017

Background: Endoscopes are well-known sources of bacterial transmission in health care facilities offering endoscopy services. The association between multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in patients who had undergone an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure with reprocessed duodenoscopes has been much discussed. Bacterial contamination of duodenoscopes has been attributed to difficulties with reprocessing these devices, specifically the distal end of the scope, which features a movable forceps elevator. In light of a recent Food and Drug Administration warning letter to Olympus regarding their closed-channel duodenoscope model TJF-Q180V, the aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of our current reprocessing procedures with regard to the TJF-Q180V duodenoscope models used in our hospital.

Methods: From August 2015-March 2016, we prospectively collected microbiologic surveillance samples from 6 TJF-Q180V model duodenoscopes in routine use at the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology using the ESwab collection system (COPAN Diagnostics Inc, Murrieta, CA).

Results: A total of 237 microbiologic samples from the forceps elevator were obtained during the survey period. None of the samples yielded microorganism growth.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that when following a diligent and validated reprocessing standard in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, closed-channel endoscope models can still be used. Nevertheless, validated adaptions of current closed-channel duodenoscope models are needed to allow for simple and safe reprocessing. Furthermore, comprehensive postmarket surveillance needs to be established.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forceps elevator
12
closed-channel duodenoscope
8
duodenoscope models
8
reprocessing
5
prospective microbiologic
4
microbiologic evaluation
4
evaluation forceps
4
closed-channel
4
elevator closed-channel
4
duodenoscopes
4

Similar Publications

Surgical Management and Proposed Protocol for Iatrogenic Separation of Bur During Maxillofacial Surgery.

J Maxillofac Oral Surg

December 2024

Present Address: Department of Dental and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, LHMC and Associated SSK and KSC Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Medical device separation or breakage is not an uncommon incident in routine maxillofacial surgery. The maxillofacial surgical procedures utilize various devices like piezosurgery tips, tungsten carbide burs, chisels and elevators. Instrument breakage or separation may be attributed to substandard grade, overused blunt instruments, repeated autoclaving, improper force application and overheating of instruments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unintentionally Retained Elevator Blade Left for 8 Years Causes Mild Chronic Pain.

J Craniofac Surg

November 2024

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de los Andes.

Fracture of surgical instruments in dental practice is not usually reported in the literature. Management involves searching for and retrieving the fragment to avoid issues such as infection, swallowing, or aspiration. Although foreign bodies may not cause symptoms for years, some can cause chronic pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tooth extraction is still one of the most common dental procedures, routinely performed for a variety of reasons. Tooth extraction forceps and elevators are well-known extraction instruments which have been the standard in tooth extraction procedures for well over a hundred years. Physics forceps are one possible alternative, aiming to perform less traumatic and more predictable extractions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radiographic Evaluation Factors That Influence the Decision of the Tooth Extraction Method.

Cureus

April 2024

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

Introduction: A simple tooth extraction method usually involves using elevators and forceps to remove the tooth easily. In contrast, a surgical extraction method requires utilizing a straight handpiece to facilitate the tooth extraction, either removing bone or sectioning the tooth into pieces.

Objective: In this research, we aim to diagnose a tooth radiographically before extraction and determine certain factors to observe which extraction method might be more feasible, either simple or surgical.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Duodenoscopes, which are tools used in certain medical procedures, can spread dangerous germs that are hard to treat.
  • An investigation into patients who got sick after using the same duodenoscope found that some of them had infections caused by harmful bacteria.
  • Even though regular testing of the duodenoscope didn’t find any germs, a deeper investigation revealed that a specific part of the tool was contaminated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!