Background: Endoscopes are well-known sources of bacterial transmission in health care facilities offering endoscopy services. The association between multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in patients who had undergone an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure with reprocessed duodenoscopes has been much discussed. Bacterial contamination of duodenoscopes has been attributed to difficulties with reprocessing these devices, specifically the distal end of the scope, which features a movable forceps elevator. In light of a recent Food and Drug Administration warning letter to Olympus regarding their closed-channel duodenoscope model TJF-Q180V, the aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of our current reprocessing procedures with regard to the TJF-Q180V duodenoscope models used in our hospital.
Methods: From August 2015-March 2016, we prospectively collected microbiologic surveillance samples from 6 TJF-Q180V model duodenoscopes in routine use at the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology using the ESwab collection system (COPAN Diagnostics Inc, Murrieta, CA).
Results: A total of 237 microbiologic samples from the forceps elevator were obtained during the survey period. None of the samples yielded microorganism growth.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that when following a diligent and validated reprocessing standard in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, closed-channel endoscope models can still be used. Nevertheless, validated adaptions of current closed-channel duodenoscope models are needed to allow for simple and safe reprocessing. Furthermore, comprehensive postmarket surveillance needs to be established.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.015 | DOI Listing |
J Maxillofac Oral Surg
December 2024
Present Address: Department of Dental and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, LHMC and Associated SSK and KSC Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Medical device separation or breakage is not an uncommon incident in routine maxillofacial surgery. The maxillofacial surgical procedures utilize various devices like piezosurgery tips, tungsten carbide burs, chisels and elevators. Instrument breakage or separation may be attributed to substandard grade, overused blunt instruments, repeated autoclaving, improper force application and overheating of instruments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
November 2024
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de los Andes.
Fracture of surgical instruments in dental practice is not usually reported in the literature. Management involves searching for and retrieving the fragment to avoid issues such as infection, swallowing, or aspiration. Although foreign bodies may not cause symptoms for years, some can cause chronic pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFolia Med (Plovdiv)
April 2024
Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Tooth extraction is still one of the most common dental procedures, routinely performed for a variety of reasons. Tooth extraction forceps and elevators are well-known extraction instruments which have been the standard in tooth extraction procedures for well over a hundred years. Physics forceps are one possible alternative, aiming to perform less traumatic and more predictable extractions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
April 2024
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Introduction: A simple tooth extraction method usually involves using elevators and forceps to remove the tooth easily. In contrast, a surgical extraction method requires utilizing a straight handpiece to facilitate the tooth extraction, either removing bone or sectioning the tooth into pieces.
Objective: In this research, we aim to diagnose a tooth radiographically before extraction and determine certain factors to observe which extraction method might be more feasible, either simple or surgical.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
March 2024
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!