A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

An evaluation of two different screening criteria in gestational diabetes mellitus. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using two different criteria: the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG).
  • A total of 320 pregnant women underwent a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with results showing a GDM prevalence of 9.1% under ADA criteria and 19.4% under IADPSG criteria.
  • The findings suggest that the IADPSG criteria significantly increase the prevalence of GDM, potentially leading to higher healthcare costs, and highlight that HbA1c levels do not contribute to GDM diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to identify the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence difference according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria and International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria for 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

Methods: This study was conducted at Erciyes University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. A total of 320 pregnant who met the criteria were included in the study and 75 g OGTT was applied. Irrespective of the first results, the test was applied to most participants 2 weeks later.

Results: The GDM prevalence was found to be 9.1% according to the ADA criteria and 19.4% according to the IADPSG criteria. According to the ADA criteria, GDM prevalence was found to be statistically significantly high (p < .05) in patients with risk factors. According to the IADPSG criteria no relationship was found between GDM prevalence and any of the risk factors (p > .05). The patients diagnosed with GDM were observed not to reach the threshold levels for HbA1c.

Conclusion: According to the IADPSG criteria, GDM prevalence doubles and leads to an increase in healthcare costs and workloads. HbA1c has no role in the diagnosis of GDM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1311858DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gdm prevalence
16
ada criteria
12
iadpsg criteria
12
criteria
8
gestational diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
criteria gdm
8
gdm
6
evaluation screening
4
screening criteria
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!