Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Fellowship Director Survey.

Aesthet Surg J

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Aesthetic Surgery Journal.

Published: September 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study identifies key factors that aesthetic surgery fellowship directors consider when selecting applicants, highlighting the importance of recommendation letters and personal skills.
  • 65% of fellowship directors responded to a survey, revealing that well-established letters of recommendation, interpersonal skills, and interview performance are the most valued criteria.
  • Conversely, traditional academic achievements like honor society membership, additional degrees, and licensing exam scores were rated as less important by the directors.
  • This information serves as a resource for prospective applicants and programs to better prepare for the fellowship selection process.

Article Abstract

Background: Desirable candidate characteristics for aesthetic surgery fellowship applicants remain unknown because of a lack of data in the literature.

Objectives: This study aims to identify the criteria used to select applicants for aesthetic surgery fellowship in the United States.

Methods: A 38-question survey was sent in April 2015 to all directors of fellowships endorsed by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (n = 20) in the United States. The survey investigated various factors including residency training and fellowship interview. A 5-point Likert scale was used to grade 33 influential factors from 1 ("not at all important") to 5 ("essential"); a separate 5-point Likert scale was used for 5 controversial factors from 1 ("very negative impact") to 5 ("very positive impact").

Results: Sixty-five percent (13 out of 20) of directors responsed. The most important factors were letters of recommendation by well-established plastic surgeons (4.6 ± 0.7), interpersonal skills (4.5 ± 0.8), overall interview performance (4.5 ± 0.7), professionalism and ethics (4.4 ± 1.0), and letters of recommendation by aesthetic surgeons (4.4 ± 1.2). The least important factors were Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society membership (1.8 ± 0.6), postgraduate degrees (1.9 ± 0.9), US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK)/Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 2 Cognitive Evaluation and USMLE/COMLEX Step 3 score (1.9 ± 0.9), and research fellowships (2.0 ± 0.6).

Conclusions: This study provides data on the aesthetic surgery fellowship directors' perceptions about the criteria important for applicant selection. We trust that fellowship directors, residency programs, and applicants find this data useful as they prepare for the aesthetic surgery fellowship match.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aesthetic surgery
20
surgery fellowship
20
fellowship
8
5-point likert
8
likert scale
8
letters recommendation
8
medical licensing
8
licensing examination
8
aesthetic
7
surgery
5

Similar Publications

Patients often use Google for their medical questions. With the emergence of artificial intelligence large language models, such as ChatGPT, patients may turn to such technologies as an alternative source of medical information. This study investigates the safety, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of medical responses provided by ChatGPT in comparison to Google for common questions about burn injuries and their management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the single largest cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Inflammation reaction mediated by NLRP3 inflammasome and Nrf2-related oxidative stress have been considered to play a very important role in the progress of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Effective drugs for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy still need to be explored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ideal methods for double eyelid crease creation in Asian upper eyelids remain controversial due to the complexity of Asian upper eyelid anatomies. Key confusions include the underestimation of tarsal height and the septum/aponeurosis fusion point height (FPH), which may underlie the unnaturally high creases in many classic double eyelid procedures.

Methods: A total of 1272 patients had tarsal heights measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This novel hybrid single-double-single barrel (1-2-1) design for fibula free flap reconstruction addresses the unique challenges presented by Brown Class III mandibular defects, which involve long-span defects at both bodies of the mandible and the chin. The importance of this design lies in its ability to overcome the limitations of traditional approaches in terms of mandible height and pedicle length, while optimizing both functional and esthetic outcomes.The technique utilizes a combination of single-double-single barrel fibula segments to achieve ideal esthetics and support for dental prosthesis across different areas of the mandible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This review examines the impact of oral retinoids, particularly isotretinoin, on incisional wound healing across surgical specialties. Commonly prescribed for dermatologic conditions, concerns persist regarding oral retinoids' potential adverse effects on wound healing, prompting the widespread practice of discontinuing these medications before surgery. We performed a PubMed search and analyzed research published regarding the use of oral retinoids in a variety of surgical subspecialties: dermatologic, plastic, ophthalmologic, orthopedic, ENT/otologic, and maxillofacial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!