This commentary on Jussim (2012) makes two points: (1) Effect sizes often reflect artifacts of experimental design rather than real-world relevance, and (2) any argument dependent on effect sizes must correct for attenuation due to instrument reliabilities. A formula for making this correction is presented, and its ramifications on the debate over accuracy in person perception are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002423 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
jussim 2012
8
close consideration
4
consideration sizes
4
sizes reviewed
4
reviewed jussim
4
2012 commentary
4
commentary jussim
4
2012 points
4
points sizes
4
sizes reflect
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!