Safety regulation in professional football: Empirical evidence of intended and unintended consequences.

J Health Econ

Department of Economics, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53211, United States. Electronic address:

Published: May 2017

In response to increasing public awareness and negative long-term health effects of concussions, the National Football League implemented the "Crown-of-the-Helmet Rule" (CHR). The CHR imposes penalties on players who initiate contact using the top of the helmet. This paper examines the intended effect of this policy and its potential for unintended consequences. We find evidence supporting the intended effect of the policy- a reduction in weekly concussion reports among defensive players by as much as 32% (34% for all head and neck injuries), but also evidence of an increase in weekly lower extremity injury reports for offensive players by as much as 34%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.01.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unintended consequences
8
safety regulation
4
regulation professional
4
professional football
4
football empirical
4
empirical evidence
4
evidence intended
4
intended unintended
4
consequences response
4
response increasing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!