Introduction: Methods for discrete choice experiment (DCE) attribute and attribute-level selection have not yet been firmly established and are rarely reported in detail. This paper describes a qualitative study designed to inform the development of a DCE survey designed to examine preferences for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatments among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods: The study involved a literature review, interviews with clinical experts, and interviews with GLP-1RA-experienced (i.e., exenatide once weekly, liraglutide once daily) and injection-naïve type 2 diabetes patients from Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, and the UK. Interviews followed a semi-structured guide including open-ended questions, and probes to capture the patients' perspective on important aspects of GLP-1RAs and concerns with injectable treatments. Qualitative analyses were performed utilizing MAXQDA version 11. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the sample.
Results: Thirty-two articles were reviewed, including 13 DCE studies. Thirty-one attributes were identified from the DCE studies, and 61 different attributes were identified in the non-DCE studies. Fifty patients completed interviews: 28 (56%) GLP-1RA-experienced and 22 (44%) injection-naïve, 54% were male, and they had a mean age of 52.8 years. Patients considered efficacy, adverse effects, and dosing frequency as the most important treatment-related attributes. From a list of five pre-defined device- or regimen-related attributes, patients considered dosing frequency, needle size, and injection preparation as the three most important attributes.
Conclusion: This study adds to the DCE literature to inform researchers on attribute selection methodology in an international setting as there is limited published information to guide researchers on best practices for selecting and defining attributes for DCE surveys.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0225-0 | DOI Listing |
J Family Med Prim Care
November 2024
Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Background: Uncontrolled diabetes persists despite guideline-based treatment, partly attributed to inadequate patient involvement. This research addresses shared decision-making by eliciting patient preferences in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) treatment based on certain key attributes and explores their correlation with socio-demographic-clinical profiles.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among T2DM outpatients in an Indian tertiary care center.
Background: Prior to COVID-19, little was known about how risks associated with such a pandemic would compete with and influence patient decision making regarding cancer risk reducing medical decision making. We investigated how the pandemic affected preferences for medical risk-reducing strategies among women at elevated risk of breast or ovarian cancer.
Methods: We conducted a discrete choice experiment.
Soc Sci Med
December 2024
Département de gestion, Evaluation et politique de santé, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; CR-IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal, 7101 Parc Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Objective: To develop a value set for the Short-Form 6-Dimension version 2 (SF-6Dv2) by incorporating societal preferences obtained from three distinct approaches: Standard Gamble (SG), composite Time Trade-Off (cTTO), and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).
Methods: Data were gathered from the general population of Quebec, Canada, using the standardized valuation protocol developed by EuroQol for the cTTO and DCE tasks, as well as the valuation protocol developed by Sheffield University for the SG. The SG and cTTO data were analyzed using OLS, GLS, GLS Tobit, and heteroskedastic Tobit models.
BMJ Open
December 2024
Stomatologic Hospital & College, Key Lab of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
Objectives: The objective of this study is to analyse the preferences of guardians of school-aged children for children's caries prevention services (CPS) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for different levels of attributes.
Design: Four key attributes were identified through a literature review and expert consultations: preventive service time, preventive effectiveness, distance (driving time to service institution) and service cost (out-of-pocket for CPS). A D-efficient design was used to create a discrete choice experiment questionnaire, and data were collected via face-to-face interviews.
BMC Psychiatry
December 2024
Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Postboks, Bergen, 7802, 5020, Norway.
Background: Opioid use disorders constitute a vast disease burden, need for comprehensive treatment, and substantial costs to individuals, families, and society. The multifaceted needs of people with opioid dependence call for integrated care. The study aims to assess the added value of an integrated medically assisted rehabilitation (MAR) program providing opioid agonist therapy for patients with opioid dependence as compared to the standard of care (SoC) in Norway.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!