It has been hypothesised that larger habitats should support more complex food webs. We consider three mechanisms which could lead to this pattern. These are increased immigration rates, increased total productivity and spatial effects on the persistence of unstable interactions. Experiments designed to discriminate between these mechanisms were carried out in laboratory aquatic microcosm communities of protista and bacteria, by independently manipulating habitat size, total productivity and immigration rate. Larger habitats supported more complex food webs, with more species, more links per species and longer maximum and mean food chains, even in the absence of differences in total energy input. Increased immigration rate resulted in more complex food webs, but habitats with higher energy input per unit area supported less complex food webs. We conclude that spatial effects on the persistence of unstable interactions, and variation in immigration rates, are plausible mechanisms by which habitat size could affect food web structure. Variation in total productivity with habitat area seems a less likely explanation for variation in food web structure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00329053 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!