Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Xenoplastic implantation of dorsal lips according to the insertion and sandwich technique shows the following results using the two speciesXenopus laevis andAmbystoma mexicanum: 1. The percentage frequency of fore head and hind head inductions is in general higher than that of mesodermal inductions. 2. Comparing the two operational techniques it is demonstrated that fore head and chorda are more frequently induced in sandwiches than with the insertion method in both combinations XU→AW and AU→XW. 3. Independent of the implantation technique the blastoporal lip of Xenopus induces in Ambystoma host tissue more frequently noses, ear vesicles, hind brain and neural tubes than doesAmbystoma dorsal lip inXenopus host tissue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00573676 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!