AI Article Synopsis

  • A study examined how well five popular force field and water model combinations predict osmotic coefficients for seven amino acids and five small molecules, indicating issues with solute-solute interactions in these simulations.
  • The most common outcome showed that the simulated osmotic coefficients were lower than actual experimental values, suggesting overly favorable interactions between solutes, except for the GROMOS54a7 model, which produced coefficients that were too high for amino acids.
  • The researchers found that minor adjustments to the van der Waals interactions, especially for charged groups and certain amino acids, allowed all force fields to more accurately match experimental data, highlighting the importance of proper parameterization in molecular simulations.

Article Abstract

There is a small, but growing, body of literature describing the use of osmotic coefficient measurements to validate and reparametrize simulation force fields. Here we have investigated the ability of five very commonly used force field and water model combinations to reproduce the osmotic coefficients of seven neutral amino acids and five small molecules. The force fields tested include AMBER ff99SB-ILDN, CHARMM36, GROMOS54a7, and OPLS-AA, with the first of these tested in conjunction with the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew water models. In general, for both the amino acids and the small molecules, the tested force fields produce computed osmotic coefficients that are lower than experiment; this is indicative of excessively favorable solute-solute interactions. The sole exception to this general trend is provided by GROMOS54a7 when applied to amino acids: in this case, the computed osmotic coefficients are consistently too high. Importantly, we show that all of the force fields tested can be made to accurately reproduce the experimental osmotic coefficients of the amino acids when minor modifications-some previously reported by others and some that are new to this study-are made to the van der Waals interactions of the charged terminal groups. Special care is required, however, when simulating Proline with a number of the force fields, and a hydroxyl-group specific modification is required in order to correct Serine and Threonine when simulated with AMBER ff99SB-ILDN. Interestingly, an alternative parametrization of the van der Waals interactions in the latter force field, proposed by the Nerenberg and Head-Gordon groups, is shown to immediately produce osmotic coefficients that are in excellent agreement with experiment. Overall, this study reinforces the idea that osmotic coefficient measurements can be used to identify general shortcomings in commonly used force fields' descriptions of solute-solute interactions and further demonstrates that modifications to van der Waals parameters provide a simple route to optimizing agreement with experiment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543770PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

force fields
20
osmotic coefficients
20
amino acids
16
force field
12
osmotic coefficient
12
coefficient measurements
12
van der
12
der waals
12
force
9
osmotic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!