Evaluation of Rectoanal Mucosal Swab Sampling for Molecular Detection of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Beef Cattle.

J Food Prot

1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933; and.

Published: April 2017

Cattle are a primary reservoir of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), and contaminated beef products are a source of human infections. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service declared seven EHEC serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157) as adulterants in raw ground beef. Sampling a large number of animals for EHEC surveillance or evaluations of EHEC-focused preharvest interventions requires a convenient and robust sampling method. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of rectoanal mucosal swab (RAMS) for the detection of the top seven EHEC serogroups. Paired fecal grab (FG) and RAMS samples were collected from 176 beef cattle and tested using the NeoSEEK Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) confirmation method. The prevalence of virulence-associated genes (stx, stx, stx, eae, and nleB) was higher in RAMS than in FG samples. The results of the two methods had poor agreement, as indicated by kappa statistics, for the detection of the seven serogroups. When FG and RAMS results were combined for comparison, RAMS was more sensitive than FG for the detection of serogroups O103 (82% versus 39%), O157 (75% versus 67%), and O45 (79% versus 73%) with similar sensitivity for the detection of serogroup O145 (67%). Serogroups O111 and O121 were detected from one and two samples, respectively, by FG and were not detected by RAMS. Serogroup O26 was not detected with either method. RAMS appears to be equivalent or superior to FG sampling for detection of the top seven EHEC serogroups in the feces of beef cattle with the NeoSEEK STEC confirmation test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-435DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

beef cattle
12
ehec serogroups
12
rectoanal mucosal
8
mucosal swab
8
enterohemorrhagic escherichia
8
escherichia coli
8
o111 o121
8
detection top
8
top ehec
8
rams samples
8

Similar Publications

Pathology of peritonitis in cattle.

J Comp Pathol

January 2025

Setor de Patologia Veterinária, Departamento de Patologia Clínica Veterinária, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Although peritonitis is highly prevalent in cattle, there have been only limited studies on the pathology of this condition. We describe the gross and histological aspects of primary and secondary peritonitis in cattle based on necropsy reports of 46 cases. Twenty-six were female (26/46; 56.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We evaluated the effects of breed and mineral source on heifer performance during periods of nutrient restriction and grazing. On day -7, ½ Angus × ½ Nelore (ANE) and Nelore (NE) heifers (12 heifers per breed; body weight, BW = 264 ± 35 kg; age = 15 ± 1 mo) were assigned to individual drylot pens to receive ad libitum Tifton 85 (Cynodon sp.) hay and white salt for 7 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Several areas of the world suffer a notably high incidence of Shiga toxin-producing . To assess the impact of persistent cross-species transmission systems on the epidemiology of O157:H7 in Alberta, Canada, we sequenced and assembled O157:H7 isolates originating from collocated cattle and human populations, 2007-2015. We constructed a timed phylogeny using BEAST2 using a structured coalescent model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to investigate whether Trypanosoma vivax is transmitted via rectal palpation in cattle, using the same glove with different blood scores, from an animal with an acute infection of this protozoan. In addition, the efficacy of iodine as disinfectant, together with water with or without the presence of feces, to prevent the transmission of T. vivax in cattle during the rectal palpation process was evaluated in the laboratory and animals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multiple omics analysis reveals the regulation of SIRT4 on lipid deposition and metabolism during the differentiation of bovine preadipocytes.

Genomics

January 2025

Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China. Electronic address:

The differentiation and lipid metabolism of preadipocytes are crucial processes in IMF deposition. Studies have demonstrated that SIRT4 plays essential roles in energy metabolism and redox homeostasis, with its expression being coordinately regulated by multiple transcription factors associated with energy and lipid metabolism. In this study, the findings of multiple omics analysis reveal that SIRT4 significantly up-regulates the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis and enhances the differentiation and lipid deposition of bovine preadipocytes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!