Temperature dependence of photocatalytic CO reduction by trans(Cl)-Ru(bpy)(CO)Cl: activation energy difference between CO and formate production.

Faraday Discuss

Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan.

Published: June 2017

The temperature dependence of photocatalytic CO reduction by trans(Cl)-Ru(bpy)(CO)Cl (bpy: 2,2'-bipyridine) has been researched in ethanol (EtOH)/N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) solutions containing [Ru(bpy)] (a photosensitizer) and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH, an electron donor). The catalytic system efficiently reduces CO to carbon monoxide (CO) with formate (HCOO) as a minor product. The mechanism of the catalysis consists of the electron-relay cycle and the catalytic cycle: in the former cycle the photochemically generated reduced species of the photosensitizer injects an electron to the catalyst, and in the latter the catalyst reduces CO. At a low concentration of the catalyst (5.0 μM), where the catalytic cycle is rate-determining, the temperature dependence of CO/HCOO is also dependent on the EtOH contents: the selectivity of CO/HCOO decreases in 20% and 40%-EtOH/DMA with increasing temperature, while it increases in 60%-EtOH/DMA. The temperature dependence of the CO/HCOO selectivity indicates that the difference in activation energy (ΔΔG) between CO and HCOO production is estimated as ca. 3.06 kJ mol in 40%-EtOH/DMA at 298 K.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6fd00242kDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

temperature dependence
16
dependence photocatalytic
8
photocatalytic reduction
8
reduction transcl-rubpycocl
8
activation energy
8
catalytic cycle
8
dependence co/hcoo
8
temperature
5
transcl-rubpycocl activation
4
energy difference
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!