Hepatic artery infusion with raltitrexed or 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

World J Gastroenterol

Jian-Hai Guo, Hang-Yu Zhang, Song Gao, Peng-Jun Zhang, Hui Chen, MD, Xiao-Dong Wang, Xu Zhu, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Interventional therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.

Published: February 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of two types of chemotherapy (raltitrexed versus 5-fluorouracil) delivered through hepatic artery infusion for treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer in patients who didn't respond to previous treatments.
  • A total of 42 patients were analyzed, with 24 receiving 5-fluorouracil and 18 receiving raltitrexed; results indicated no significant survival difference between the two treatment groups, with median survival times of 20.6 months for raltitrexed and 15.4 months for 5-fluorouracil after starting HAIC.
  • Side effects varied, with more cases of leuk

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using raltitrexed or 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis (CRCLM).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable CRCLM who failed systemic chemotherapy and were subsequently treated with HAIC at our institute from May 2013 to April 2015 was performed. A total of 24 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil, and 18 patients were treated with raltitrexed.

Results: The median survival time (MST) from diagnosis of CRC was 40.8 mo in the oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (TOMOX) arm and 33.5 mo in the oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) arm ( = 0.802). MST from first HAIC was 20.6 mo in the TOMOX arm and 15.4 mo in the FOLFOX arm ( = 0.734). Median progression-free survival (PFS) from first HAIC was 4.9 mo and 6.6 mo, respectively, in the TOMOX arm and FOLFOX arm ( = 0.215). Leukopenia ( = 0.026) was more common in the FOLFOX arm, and hepatic disorder ( = 0.039) was more common in the TOMOX arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in the TOMOX arm and one treatment-related death in the FOLFOX arm. Analysis of prognostic factors indicated that response to HAIC was a significant factor related to survival.

Conclusion: No significant difference in survival was observed between the TOMOX and FOLFOX arms. HAIC treatment with either TOMOX or FOLFOX was demonstrated as an efficient and safe alternative choice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5330825PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1406DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tomox arm
20
folfox arm
20
arm
10
hepatic artery
8
artery infusion
8
raltitrexed 5-fluorouracil
8
5-fluorouracil colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
liver metastasis
8
patients treated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!