AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study compares two techniques for treating posterior malleolar fractures (PMF): direct reduction (DR) via a posterolateral approach and indirect reduction (IR) using ligamentotaxis, focusing on their effectiveness and clinical outcomes.
  • - A total of 116 patients participated, with better fracture reduction quality and functional outcomes recorded in the DR group, showing a higher median AOFAS score of 87 compared to 80 for the IR group.
  • - The results suggest that the DR technique leads to improved fracture reduction and functional recovery, though both methods showed similar pain levels according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Article Abstract

Background: The optimal method for the reduction and fixation of posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) remains inconclusive. Currently, both of the indirect and direct reduction techniques are widely used. We aimed to compare the reduction quality and clinical outcome of posterior malleolar fracture managed with the direct reduction technique through posterolateral approach or the indirect reduction technique using ligamentotaxis.

Methods: Patients with a PMF involving over 25% of the articular surface were recruited and assigned to the direct reduction (DR) group or the indirect reduction (IR) group. Following reduction and fixation of the fracture, the quality of fracture reduction was evaluated in post-operative CT images. Clinical and radiological follow-ups were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and then at 6 month-intervals postoperatively. Functional outcome (AOFAS score), ankle range of motion, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated at the last follow-up. Statistical differences were compared between the DR and IR groups considering the patient demographics, quality of fracture reduction, AOFAS score, and VAS.

Results: Totally 116 patients were included, wherein 64 cases were assigned to the DR group and 52 cases were assigned to the IR group. The quality of fracture reduction was significant higher in the DR group (P = 0.038). In the patients who completed a minimum of 12 months' follow-up, a median AOFAS score of 87 was recorded in the DR group, which was significantly higher than that recorded in the IR group (a median score of 80). The ankle range of motion was slightly better in the DR group, with the mean dorsiflexion restriction recorded to be 5.2° and 6.1° in the DR and IR group respectively (P = 0.331). Similar VAS score was observed in the two groups (P = 0.419).

Conclusions: The direct reduction technique through a posterolateral approach provide better quality of fracture reduction and functional outcome in the management of PMF over 25% of articular surface, as compared with the indirect reduction technique using ligamentotaxis.

Trial Registration: NCT02801474 (retrospectively registered, June 2016, ClinicalTrails.gov).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351253PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1475-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

indirect reduction
16
direct reduction
16
reduction technique
16
quality fracture
16
fracture reduction
16
reduction
15
posterior malleolar
12
aofas score
12
group
9
reduction techniques
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!