Treatment with cochlear implants (CIs) in single-sided deaf individuals started less than a decade ago. CIs can successfully reduce incapacitating tinnitus on the deaf ear and allow, so some extent, the restoration of binaural hearing. Until now, systematic evaluations of subjective CI benefit in post-lingually single-sided deaf individuals and analyses of speech intelligibility outcome for the CI in isolation have been lacking. For the prospective part of this study, the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness Questionnaire (BBSS) was administered to 48 single-sided deaf CI users to evaluate the subjectively perceived CI benefit across different listening situations. In the retrospective part, speech intelligibility outcome with the CI up to 12 month post-activation was compared between 100 single-sided deaf CI users and 125 bilaterally implanted CI users (2nd implant). The positive median ratings in the BBSS differed significantly from zero for all items suggesting that most individuals with single-sided deafness rate their CI as beneficial across listening situations. The speech perception scores in quiet and noise improved significantly over time in both groups of CI users. Speech intelligibility with the CI in isolation was significantly better in bilaterally implanted CI users (2nd implant) compared to the scores obtained from single-sided deaf CI users. Our results indicate that CI users with single-sided deafness can reach open set speech understanding with their CI in isolation, encouraging the extension of the CI indication to individuals with normal hearing on the contralateral ear. Compared to the performance reached with bilateral CI users' second implant, speech reception threshold are lower, indicating an aural preference and dominance of the normal hearing ear. The results from the BBSS propose good satisfaction with the CI across several listening situations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.03.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single-sided deaf
24
speech intelligibility
16
single-sided deafness
12
deaf users
12
listening situations
12
single-sided
9
subjective benefit
8
benefit single-sided
8
deaf individuals
8
intelligibility outcome
8

Similar Publications

Cochlear Implant Sound Quality.

J Speech Lang Hear Res

January 2025

Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore how cochlear implant (CI) patients describe sound quality compared to descriptions given by single-sided deaf (SSD) patients for their normal-hearing ears.
  • Participants included patients with different CI brands who completed a questionnaire focused on sound quality using 25 descriptive adjectives, assessing their impressions near activation and years later.
  • Results showed that initial descriptors included terms like "Computer-like" and "Metallic," but evolved to "Clear" over time, indicating that experienced CI users may notice less about sound discrepancies compared to SSD patients who have a normal hearing benchmark.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perception of voice cues and speech-in-speech by children with prelingual single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant.

Hear Res

December 2024

Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; W.J. Kolff Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Materials Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Voice cues, such as fundamental frequency (F0) and vocal tract length (VTL), help listeners identify the speaker's gender, perceive the linguistic and emotional prosody, and segregate competing talkers. Postlingually implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) users seem to have difficulty in perceiving and making use of voice cues, especially of VTL. Early implanted child CI users, in contrast, perceive and make use of both voice cues better than CI adults, and in patterns similar to their peers with normal hearing (NH).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There is currently a lack of prospective studies comparing multiple treatment options for single-sided deafness (SSD) in terms of long-term sound localization outcomes. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the objective and subjective sound localization abilities of SSD patients treated with a cochlear implant (CI), a bone conduction device (BCD), a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aid, or no treatment after two years of follow-up. About 120 eligible patients were randomized to cochlear implantation or to a trial period with first a BCD on a headband, then a CROS (or vice versa).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS) can be responsible for single-sided deafness (SSD). Hearing restoration can be a challenge both for the otolaryngologist and the patient. : In a retrospective series, we analyzed the charts of SSD patients operated on for VS from 2005-2021, checking which type of hearing rehabilitation was chosen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biomarkers of auditory cortical plasticity and development of binaural pathways in children with unilateral hearing loss using a hearing aid.

Hear Res

September 2024

Department of Communication Disorders, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel. Electronic address:

Congenital or early-onset unilateral hearing loss (UHL) can disrupt the normal development of the auditory system. In extreme cases of UHL (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!