AI Article Synopsis

  • Secondary fluorescence is a critical aspect of the Z·A·F matrix correction that presents challenges for Monte Carlo simulations, with only PENEPMA and NIST DTSA-II effectively handling it.
  • PENEPMA is based on PENELOPE for general-purpose electron interactions, while NIST DTSA-II is tailored for subrelativistic electrons, employing advanced variance reduction techniques for better efficiency.
  • Both models excel in simulating complex sample geometries and show comparable accuracy when analyzing experimental data on secondary fluorescence.

Article Abstract

Secondary fluorescence, the final term in the familiar matrix correction triumvirate Z·A·F, is the most challenging for Monte Carlo models to simulate. In fact, only two implementations of Monte Carlo models commonly used to simulate electron probe X-ray spectra can calculate secondary fluorescence-PENEPMA and NIST DTSA-II a (DTSA-II is discussed herein). These two models share many physical models but there are some important differences in the way each implements X-ray emission including secondary fluorescence. PENEPMA is based on PENELOPE, a general purpose software package for simulation of both relativistic and subrelativistic electron/positron interactions with matter. On the other hand, NIST DTSA-II was designed exclusively for simulation of X-ray spectra generated by subrelativistic electrons. NIST DTSA-II uses variance reduction techniques unsuited to general purpose code. These optimizations help NIST DTSA-II to be orders of magnitude more computationally efficient while retaining detector position sensitivity. Simulations execute in minutes rather than hours and can model differences that result from detector position. Both PENEPMA and NIST DTSA-II are capable of handling complex sample geometries and we will demonstrate that both are of similar accuracy when modeling experimental secondary fluorescence data from the literature.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1431927617000307DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nist dtsa-ii
24
secondary fluorescence
16
monte carlo
12
carlo models
8
x-ray spectra
8
general purpose
8
detector position
8
dtsa-ii
7
nist
6
secondary
5

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the accuracy of electron-excited X-ray microanalysis using energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) at a low beam energy of 5 keV, suitable for analyzing almost all elements on the periodic table, except hydrogen and helium.
  • Elemental analysis was performed on various certified reference materials, stoichiometric compounds, minerals, and metal alloys, totaling 263 measurements across 39 elements in 113 materials.
  • Results showed high accuracy, with over 98% of measurements within ±5% relative deviation from expected values, and 82% falling within a tighter range of -2% to 2% relative deviation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A quantification model which uses standard X-ray spectra collected from bulk materials to determine the composition and mass thickness of single-layer and multilayer unsupported thin films is presented. The multivariate model can be iteratively solved for single layers in which each element produces at least one visible characteristic X-ray line. The model can be extended to multilayer thin films in which each element is associated with only one layer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

NIST DTSA-II is a free, open access, and fully-documented comprehensive software platform for electron-excited X-ray microanalysis with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS), including tools for quantification, measurement optimization, and spectrum simulation. EDS simulation utilizes a Monte Carlo electron trajectory simulation that includes characteristic and continuum X-ray generation, self-absorption, EDS window absorption, and energy-to-charge conversion leading to peak broadening. Spectra are simulated on an absolute basis considering electron dose and spectrometer parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Electron-excited X-ray microanalysis with energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) proceeds through the application of the software that extracts characteristic X-ray intensities and performs corrections for the physics of electron and X-ray interactions with matter to achieve quantitative elemental analysis. NIST DTSA-II is an open-access, fully documented, and freely available comprehensive software platform for EDS quantification, measurement optimization, and spectrum simulation. Spectrum simulation with DTSA-II enables the prediction of the EDS spectrum from any target composition for a specified electron dose and for the solid angle and window parameters of the EDS spectrometer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Secondary fluorescence is a critical aspect of the Z·A·F matrix correction that presents challenges for Monte Carlo simulations, with only PENEPMA and NIST DTSA-II effectively handling it.
  • PENEPMA is based on PENELOPE for general-purpose electron interactions, while NIST DTSA-II is tailored for subrelativistic electrons, employing advanced variance reduction techniques for better efficiency.
  • Both models excel in simulating complex sample geometries and show comparable accuracy when analyzing experimental data on secondary fluorescence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!