https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=28280936&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 282809362018090620181113
1432-12546182017AugInternational journal of biometeorologyInt J BiometeorolThermoregulation of the bovine scrotum 1: measurements of free-range animals in a paddock and pen.138113871381-138710.1007/s00484-017-1315-3The bull's scrotum and scrotal cord vasculature has traditionally been regarded as a thermoregulatory device for maintaining optimal testicular temperature for normal spermatogenesis. This assumption has mostly been derived from discrete measurements using thermocouples with limited data correlating continuous scrotal temperature (ST) to body temperature (BT). From mid-summer to early autumn, four Wagyu bulls (9-18 months) were surgically implanted with two data loggers (DL) logging at 30 min intervals: one on the right hand side flank and the other was attached to the visceral vaginal tunic of the mid-testis. Bulls were firstly housed in a paddock (PK) for 13 days and then moved to individual pens (IP), again for 13 days. Repeated measures analysis modelled the long-term and diurnal trends in BT and ST. While both day and time of day (TOD) were significant effects for ST at both housing locations (P < 0.005), only TOD showed significance for BT at both locations (P < 0.0001). Significant effects were seen between bulls with ST (F = 167.2, P < 0.001) but not BT (F = 0.03, P = 0.863), suggestive of variation in individual bull thermoregulatory capacity. Dual peaks were observed in ST at 0500 and 2130 h when housed in PK but not IP, suggesting ST may be influenced by external stimuli such as postural or behavioural changes. Reporting concurrent and continuous BT and ST will allow further investigation into factors influencing bovine ST and should be useful in selecting bulls with high degrees of thermoregulation capacity.WallageAndrea LALSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia. a.wallage@uq.edu.au.JohnstonS DSDSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.LisleA TATSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.BeardLLSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.LeesA MAMSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.CollinsC WCWSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4343, Australia.GaughanJ BJBSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.engJournal Article20170309
United StatesInt J Biometeorol03747160020-7128IMAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBody TemperatureBody Temperature RegulationCattlephysiologyHumidityMaleScrotumphysiologyTemperatureBody temperatureBovineScrotal temperatureScrotumThermoregulation
20167312017124201712120173116020189760201731160ppublish2828093610.1007/s00484-017-1315-310.1007/s00484-017-1315-3J Anim Sci. 1997 Mar;75(3):767-749078495J Androl. 1997 Sep-Oct;18(5):549-559349754Theriogenology. 1979 Feb;11(2):111-2916725397J Reprod Fertil. 1998 Nov;114(2):179-9410070346Aust J Biol Sci. 1988;41(1):69-853077741Rev Reprod. 1998 Jan;3(1):13-229509985J Comp Physiol B. 2001 Jun;171(5):401-1111497128J Reprod Fertil. 1996 Sep;108(1):81-58958832Theriogenology. 2004 Jan 15;61(2-3):511-2814662148J Anim Sci. 2008 Jan;86(1):226-3417911236J Anim Sci. 1999;77 Suppl 2:10-2015526777Int J Biometeorol. 2017 Jul;61(7):1309-132128337635Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1962 Oct;47:314-2313998338Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;286:123-352042495J Appl Physiol. 1966 Nov;21(6):1784-905951717