AI Article Synopsis

  • Management of complicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is on the rise due to low retrieval rates, with perforation requiring filter removal through endovascular or surgical methods.
  • A study reviewed five cases of IVC filter explantation due to caval perforation, noting that most patients were females with an average age of 50, and common symptoms included abdominal pain.
  • The procedures included both open surgery and endovascular retrieval, with all patients recovering well post-operation and no related mortality, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of patients with a history of IVC filters exhibiting abdominal pain.

Article Abstract

Background: Management of complicated indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters has increased due to low retrieval rates. Filter migration and perforation are infrequent complications and require explantation of the filter. We report our recent experience with endovascular retrieval and surgical explantation of IVC filters after caval perforation.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who had IVC filter explantation between 2014 and 2015. Patient demographics, indication for filter placement, clinical presentation, surgical indication and technique, and outcomes were noted.

Results: Five cases of IVC filter removal due to caval perforation were identified. Four patients were female, and the median age was 50. Four IVC filters were of the retrievable type and had an average indwelling time of 4 years. One filter was permanent with an indwelling time of 9 years. The most common presentation was abdominal pain. Four patients had an open operation: 2 performed via laparotomy and 2 with retroperitoneal exposure of the IVC. One patient required median sternotomy and explantation of device fragments that migrated to the right ventricle. One patient had endovascular retrieval, with filter indwelling time of 0.8 years. No mortality occurred related to device removal. All patients had resolution of pain at their postoperative visit.

Conclusions: Patients presenting with abdominal pain and history of IVC filter placement should cause concern for possible caval strut perforation. Endovascular retrieval or surgical explantation are required for removal and can be accomplished with minimal risk to the patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.11.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ivc filters
12
endovascular retrieval
12
ivc filter
12
indwelling time
12
inferior vena
8
vena cava
8
filter
8
retrieval surgical
8
surgical explantation
8
filter placement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!