AI Article Synopsis

  • The review aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and quality of evidence regarding pain relief methods following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
  • Various randomized controlled trials were analyzed for opioid use, pain levels, side effects, and hospital stay duration, revealing significant variations in methods and outcomes.
  • Despite finding potential pain relief benefits from several interventions, the overall evidence quality was low, making it difficult to recommend a standard analgesic approach after TKA.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to document efficacy, safety and quality of evidence of analgesic interventions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: This PRISMA-compliant and PROSPERO-registered review includes all-language randomized controlled trials of medication-based analgesic interventions after TKA. Bias was evaluated according to Cochrane methodology. Outcomes were opioid consumption (primary), pain scores at rest and during mobilization, adverse events, and length of stay. Interventions investigated in three or more trials were meta-analysed. Outcomes were evaluated using forest plots, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), L'Abbe Plots and trial sequential analysis.

Results: The included 113 trials, investigating 37 different analgesic interventions, were characterized by unclear/high risk of bias, low assay sensitivity and considerable differences in pain assessment tools, basic analgesic regimens, and reporting of adverse events. In meta-analyses single and continuous femoral nerve block (FNB), intrathecal morphine, local infiltration analgesia, intraarticular injection of local anaesthetics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and gabapentinoids demonstrated significant analgesic effects. The 24-hour morphine-sparing effects ranged from 4.2 mg (CI: 1.3, 7.2; intraarticular local anaesthetics), to 16.6 mg (CI: 11.2, 22; single FNB). Pain relieving effects at rest at 6 hours ranged from 4 mm (CI: -10, 2; gabapentinoids), to 19 mm (CI: 8, 31; single FNB), and at 24 hours from 3 mm (CI: -2, 8; gabapentinoids), to 16 mm (CI: 8, 23; continuous FNB). GRADE-rated quality of evidence was generally low.

Conclusion: A low quality of evidence, small sample sizes and heterogeneity of trial designs prohibit designation of an optimal procedure-specific analgesic regimen after TKA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342240PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173107PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality evidence
12
analgesic interventions
12
total knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8
systematic review
8
adverse events
8
local anaesthetics
8
single fnb
8
analgesic
6
postoperative pain
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!