Background: The assessment of quality of care is an integral part of modern medicine. The referral represents the handing over of care from the general practitioner to the specialist. This study aimed to assess whether an improved referral could lead to improved quality of care.

Methods: A cluster randomized trial with the general practitioner surgery as the clustering unit was performed. Fourteen surgeries in the area surrounding the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad were randomized stratified by town versus countryside location. The intervention consisted of implementing referral templates for new referrals in four clinical areas: dyspepsia; suspected colorectal cancer; chest pain; and confirmed or suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The control group followed standard referral practice. Quality of treatment pathway as assessed by newly developed quality indicators was used as main outcome. Secondary outcomes included subjective quality assessment, positive predictive value of referral and adequacy of prioritization. Assessment of outcomes was done at the individual level. The patients, hospital doctors and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention status.

Results: A total of 500 patients were included, with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm. From the multilevel regression model the effect of the intervention on the quality indicator score was insignificant at 1.80% (95% CI, -1.46 to 5.06, p = 0.280). No significant differences between the intervention and the control groups were seen in the secondary outcomes. Active use of the referral intervention was low, estimated at approximately 50%. There was also wide variation in outcome scoring between the different assessors.

Conclusions: In this study no measurable effect on quality of care or prioritization was revealed after implementation of referral templates at the general practitioner/hospital interface. The results were hindered by a limited uptake of the intervention at GP surgeries and inconsistencies in outcome assessment.

Trial Registration: The study was registered under registration number NCT01470963 on September 5th, 2011.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341470PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2127-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

referral templates
12
quality care
12
referral
8
quality
8
cluster randomized
8
general practitioner
8
secondary outcomes
8
intervention
7
templates out-patient
4
out-patient quality
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Community health workers (CHWs) help bridge the cultural gap between health services and the communities they serve. CHWs work with physicians, nurses and social workers, but little is known about their collaboration with pharmacists. This scoping review aims to describe the interprofessional collaboration between CHWs and pharmacists, the types of interventions they deliver and CHWs' and pharmacists' specific roles within these interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving radiology reporting locally and globally: who, how and why?

Br J Radiol

December 2024

Jones Radiology, Adelaide, SA, 5063, Australia.

The radiology report is the communication from radiologist to referrer, used to inform prognosis and guide patient management. The report is the final step in a process which is influenced by the information on the referral, image quality, the reporting environment and appropriate detection and interpretation of findings by the radiologist. It should present accurate, complete information in a way that can be easily understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The complexity of patient care demands that health care teams collaborate effectively. This means that when pastoral care staff engage with patients, they need to communicate their findings to other members of the multidisciplinary team to maximize patient benefits. In 2016, an Australian hospital found that pastoral care staff were able to visit only 30% of admitted patients, and that documentation of pastoral care visits was minimal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is still considerable heterogeneity regarding which features of cryptoglandular anal fistula on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) are relevant to surgical decision-making. As a consequence, the quality and completeness of the report are highly dependent on the training and experience of the examiners.

Aim: To develop a structured MRI and EAUS template (SMART) reporting the minimum dataset of information for the treatment of anal fistulas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study was a prospective pre-post design aimed at improving the quality of documentation for maxillofacial trauma in the emergency department using a structured template.
  • By evaluating 220 patients, it found an 18.95% improvement in record completeness when using the template, particularly in key areas like time of evaluation and ophthalmic assessments.
  • The findings suggest that the structured template enhances thoroughness and accuracy in documenting injuries, leading to better clinical care and reduced risk of medical negligence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!