Carrots, Not Sticks: Adverse Impact and Wellness Programs.

J Occup Environ Med

Department of Psychology (Drs Switzer, Cheung, Burns, Sinclair, Tyler, McCubbin); and Department of Management, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina (Dr Roth).

Published: March 2017

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if wellness programs are likely to produce an adverse impact in various protected groups and to determine what features of the program may contribute to adverse impact.

Methods: Using a nationally representative sample of US adults, we examined the proportions of protected groups that would be expected to encounter adverse impact using various health factors such as weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels.

Results: The results of this study indicate that disincentive-based programs pose a high risk of differentially selecting protected groups into program categories. This is especially true for members of multiple protected classes.

Conclusions: We suggest organizations carefully consider both the type of program and the health factors incorporated into their wellness efforts and use incentives rather than disincentives to encourage health promotion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000940DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse impact
12
protected groups
12
wellness programs
8
health factors
8
carrots sticks
4
adverse
4
sticks adverse
4
impact wellness
4
programs objective
4
objective purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!