Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are intended to provide independent communication for those with the most severe physical impairments. However, development and testing of BCIs is typically conducted with copy-spelling of provided text, which models only a small portion of a functional communication task. This study was designed to determine how BCI performance is affected by novel text generation. We used a within-subject single-session study design in which subjects used a BCI to perform copy-spelling of provided text and to generate self-composed text to describe a picture. Additional off-line analysis was performed to identify changes in the event-related potentials that the BCI detects and to examine the effects of training the BCI classifier on task-specific data. Accuracy was reduced during the picture description task; ((8)=2.59 =0.0321). Creating the classifier using self-generated text data significantly improved accuracy on these data; ((7)=-2.68, =0.0317), but did not bring performance up to the level achieved during copy-spelling. Thus, this study shows that the task for which the BCI is used makes a difference in BCI accuracy. Task-specific BCI classifiers are a first step to counteract this effect, but additional study is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333876 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!