Objective: To compare postanesthetic xylazine and dexmedetomidine on recovery characteristics from sevoflurane anesthesia in horses.
Study Design: Randomized, crossover study.
Animals: Six geldings, mean±standard deviation (SD) (range), 17±4 (11-24) years and 527±80 (420-660) kg.
Methods: Horses were anesthetized with sevoflurane for 60 minutes under standardized conditions for a regional limb perfusion study. In recovery, horses were administered either xylazine (200 μg kg) or dexmedetomidine (0.875 μg kg) intravenously. Recoveries were unassisted and were video-recorded for later evaluation of recovery events and quality by two individuals unaware of treatment allocation. Recovery quality was assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0=poor recovery, 100=excellent recovery), the Edinburgh Scoring System (ESS) (0-100; 100=excellent recovery) and the mean attempt interval (MAI) (longer=better). Data are mean±SD.
Results: All recovery quality assessments (xylazine and dexmedetomidine, respectively: VAS: 71±21 mm, 84±13 mm; ESS: 65±22, 67±30; MAI: 52±24 minutes, 60±32 minutes) and events (first limb movement: 37±8 minutes, 42±10 minutes; first attempt to lift head: 44±12 minutes, 48±9 minutes; first attempt to sternal posture: 57±28 minutes, 50±7 minutes; number of head bangs: 2.0±3.0, 0.5±0.5; time to first attempt to stand: 72±6 minutes, 78±13 minutes; time to standing: 79±14 minutes, 84±13 minutes) did not differ significantly between treatments (p>0.05).
Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: Recovery characteristics did not differ significantly between postanesthetic xylazine and dexmedetomidine following 1 hour of sevoflurane anesthesia in horses in this study. Further evaluations in more horses and in younger horses are required to confirm these results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.04.002 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!