Study Objective: To confirm the safety and feasibility outcomes of robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and compare the clinicopathological features of women requiring adjuvant treatment with the historical literature.
Design: Retrospective cohort study and review of literature (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Patients: All patients who underwent robotic radical parametrectomy with upper vaginectomy (RRPV), and pelvic lymphadenectomy for occult cervical cancer discovered after an extrafascial hysterectomy at our institution between January 2007 and December 2015.
Interventions: RRPV and pelvic lymphadenectomy for occult cervical cancer discovered after an extrafascial hysterectomy. We also performed a literature review of the literature on radical parametrectomy after occult cervical carcinoma.
Measurements And Main Results: Seventeen patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix discovered after extrafascial hysterectomy underwent RRPV with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. There were 2 intraoperative complications, including 1 bowel injury and 1 bladder injury. One patient required a blood transfusion of 2 units. Three patients underwent adjuvant treatment with chemoradiation with radiation-sensitizing cisplatin. One of these patients had residual carcinoma on the upper vagina, 1 patient had positive parametria and pelvic nodes, and 1 patient had positive pelvic lymph nodes. No patients experienced recurrence, and 1 patient died from unknown causes at 59.4 months after surgery. We analyzed 15 studies reported in the literature and found 238 women who underwent radical parametrectomy; however, no specific preoperative pathological features predicted outcomes, the need for adjuvant treatment, or parametrial involvement.
Conclusion: RRPV is a feasible and safe treatment option. As reflected in the literature, RRPV can help avoid empiric adjuvant chemoradiation; however, no pathological features predict the need for adjuvant treatment after surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.016 | DOI Listing |
Gynecol Oncol
December 2024
Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address:
Ann Surg Oncol
October 2024
Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Cervical cancer has been and still is a major global health problem and a major treatment challenge for which surgical interventions have played a key role throughout the past century. In early stages (I/A2-II/B), where high-risk factors are not present, the efficacy of surgical and radiotherapy treatment has been considered equivalent with different (treatment modality specific) complications and quality of life consequences. Negative prognostic factors in early stages of the disease (pelvic lymph-node positivity) and in more advanced stages (parametrial and/or surgical margins' tumor involvement) forecast the deterioration of outlooks for good life expectancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Med
August 2023
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Two pillars in modern oncology are treatment personalization and the reduction in treatment-related morbidity. For decades, the one-fits-all concept of radical hysterectomy has been the cornerstone of early-stage cervical cancer surgical treatment. However, no agreement exists about the prevalent method of parametrial invasion, and the literature is conflicting regarding the extent of parametrectomy needed to achieve adequate surgical radicality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA prospective analysis of a retrospective data of patients with cervix carcinoma treated by minimal invasive surgery at high-volume gynecology oncology center analyzing that minimal access surgery is an acceptable treatment modality in cervix carcinoma. The study included 423 patients who underwent laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy after pre-operative evaluation after taking their consent and obtaining ethical approval from the IRB. Post-operatively, patients were followed up at regular intervals for clinical examination and ultrasonography for a median range of 36 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Oncol
July 2023
3(rd) Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine in Plzeň, Charles University, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Czech Republic.
Introduction: The standard procedure in cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). Because of the increasing age of women bearing children, fertility has become a major challenge. We present pregnancy results after less radical fertility-sparing surgery in women with IA1, LVSI positive, IA2 and IB1 (<2 cm, infiltration less than half of the cervical stroma).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!