Photopic, Mesopic, and Scotopic Visual Acuity After 18 mW/cm2 Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking.

Eye Contact Lens

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.A., A.F.), School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Noor Ophthalmology Research Center (H.H., M.M., S.S.), Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran; Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology (E.J.), Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran; and Stein Eye Institute (S.M.), University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

Published: September 2018

Objectives: One-year changes in uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity under different lighting conditions after accelerated cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus in comparison with nontreated cases.

Methods: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, the sample included 50 eyes in the CXL group and 40 eyes in the control group. Visual acuity was tested under photopic (100 lux), mesopic (20 lux), and scotopic (0.5 lux) lighting conditions at 6 months and 1 year.

Results: Changes in all studied variables were similar in the two groups (all P>0.05) after adjusting for age, but the 0.02±0.17 logMAR reduction in scotopic UDVA in the CXL group showed a difference of marginal significance compared with the control group (P=0.061). In cases with baseline UDVA≤20/40, 1-year adjusted results in the CXL and control groups were, respectively, 0.61±0.34 and 0.83±0.35 logMAR for photopic UDVA (P=0.021), 0.48±0.22 and 0.68±0.27 logMAR for mesopic UDVA (P=0.033), and 0.21±0.14 and 0.26±0.07 logMAR for mesopic CDVA (P=0.056). In those with baseline UDVA greater than 20/40, 1-year adjusted results in the CXL and control groups were, respectively, 0.12±0.20 and 0.06±0.10 logMAR for mesopic UDVA (P=0.034) and 0.15±0.18 and 0.07±0.06 logMAR for scotopic UDVA (P=0.024). Other vision indices showed no significant intergroup differences (all P>0.05).

Conclusion: Poor vision (UDVA≤20/40) keratoconus cases are more likely to achieve improved vision or a halt in its deterioration after CXL. In cases with good vision (UDVA>20/40), however, although further photopic vision impairment is halted, they may experience worse vision under mesopic and scotopic conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000377DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual acuity
12
logmar mesopic
12
mesopic scotopic
8
lighting conditions
8
cxl group
8
control group
8
scotopic udva
8
1-year adjusted
8
adjusted cxl
8
cxl control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!