Objectives: This investigation aimed to determine the validity of script concordance test (SCT), compared with clinical-case-related short-answer management problems (SAMP), in fourth-year medical students.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Medical School of Lille University. Cardiology and gynecology examinations both included 3 SCT and 2 clinical-case-related SAMP. Final score did not include SCT results, and was out of 20 points. The passing score was ≥10/20. Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used to compare quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively. Correlation between scores was also analyzed.
Results: A total of 519 and 521 students completed SAMP and SCT in cardiology and gynecology, respectively. Cardiology score was significantly higher in SCT than SAMP (mean ± SD 13.5±2.4 versus 11.4±2.6, Wilcoxon test, p<0.001). In gynecology, SCT score was significantly lower than SAMP score (10.8±2.6 versus 11.4±2.7, Wilcoxon test, p=0.001). SCT and SAMP scores were significantly correlated (p <0.05, Pearson's correlation). However, percentage of students with SCT score ≥ 10/20 was similar among those who passed or failed cardiology (327 of 359 (91%) vs 146 of 160 (91%), χ=0.004, df =1, p=0.952), or gynecology (274 of 379 (65%) vs 84 of 142 (59%), χ=1.614, df=1, p=0.204) SAMP test. Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.31 and 0.92 for all SCT and SAMP, respectively.
Conclusions: Although significantly correlated, the scores obtained in SCT and SAMP were significantly different in fourth-year medical students. These findings suggest that SCT should not be used for summative purposes in fourth-year medical students.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339020 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5898.2f91 | DOI Listing |
Int J Appl Basic Med Res
November 2024
Director, Simulation Centre, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry - Cuddalore Road, Pillayarkuppam, Puducherry, India.
Background: Although the curriculum has changed, assessment tools are not in alignment with the new types of teaching such as early clinical exposure (ECE) and self-directed learning. Both in summative and formative assessment most commonly used tools for assessment of cognitive domain are written formats including MCQ. However, these assessment tools such as MCQ and written essays cannot assess the higher order thinking skills and clinical reasoning skills.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTunis Med
November 2024
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Mongi Slim Hospital. University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine, Tunis, Tunisia.
Unlabelled: Introduction-Aim: Clinical reasoning in situations of uncertainty is a skill to be acquired from initial training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical reasoning ability in a context of uncertainty of health science students using the Script Concordance Test (SCT).
Methods: This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study which included students in the third year of the National License in Anesthesia-Resuscitation, with their consent, and a panel of experts made up of ten members.
BMC Anesthesiol
October 2024
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.
Background: Working long consecutive hours' is common for anaesthesia and critical care physicians. It is associated with impaired medical reasoning's performance of anaesthesiology and serious medical errors. However, no study has yet investigated the impact of working long consecutive hours' on medical reasoning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedEdPORTAL
September 2024
Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Introduction: Clinical reasoning (CR) is required for physicians. Pediatric residents often gain CR skills through experiential learning. Currently, deliberate education on CR targeted toward pediatric residents is inconsistent.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNurs Educ Perspect
September 2024
About the Authors Marie-France Deschênes, PhD, RN, is assistant professor, Faculty of Nursing Science, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, and a regular researcher, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montréal, Canada. Éric Dionne, PhD, is professor, Faculty of Education Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, and research chair, Institut du Savoir de l'Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, Canada. Laura Robert-Boluda, MSc, RNAm, is a doctoral student, Faculté des Sciences de l'Education et de la Formation, Université Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France. The first author received a postdoctoral fellowship scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. For more information, contact Dr. Deschênes, at
Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!