Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma.

J Clin Oncol

Christine G. Kohn, University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy; Christine G. Kohn, University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford, CT; Simon B. Zeichner, Daniel A. Goldstein, and Christopher R. Flowers, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University; Qiushi Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Alberto J. Montero, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Daniel A. Goldstein, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Published: April 2017

Purpose Patients who are diagnosed with stage IV metastatic melanoma have an estimated 5-year relative survival rate of only 17%. Randomized controlled trials of recent US Food and Drug Administration-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors-pembrolizumab (PEM), nivolumab (NIVO), and ipilumumab (IPI)-demonstrate improved patient outcomes, but the optimal treatment sequence in patients with BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma remains unclear. To inform policy makers about the value of these treatments, we developed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for sequencing novel agents for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Materials and Methods We developed Markov models by using a US-payer perspective and lifetime horizon to estimate costs (2016 US$) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for treatment sequences with first-line NIVO, IPI, NIVO + IPI, PEM every 2 weeks, and PEM every 3 weeks. Health states were defined for initial treatment, first and second progression, and death. Rates for drug discontinuation, frequency of adverse events, disease progression, and death obtained from randomized phase III trials were used to determine the likelihood of transition between states. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Results PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI was both more effective and less costly than dacarbazine followed by IPI then NIVO, or IPI followed by NIVO. Compared with the first-line dacarbazine treatment strategy, NIVO followed by IPI produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $90,871/QALY, and first-line NIVO + IPI followed by carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $198,867/QALY. Conclusion For patients with treatment-naive BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, first-line PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI or first-line NIVO followed by second-line IPI are the most cost-effective, immune-based treatment strategies for metastatic melanoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791832PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.6336DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nivo ipi
20
pem weeks
16
braf wild-type
12
advanced melanoma
12
metastatic melanoma
12
first-line nivo
12
ipi nivo
12
second-line ipi
12
ipi
9
immune checkpoint
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab and ipilimumab show promise in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but their effectiveness varies among patients, highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers.
  • A study of 116 advanced RCC patients in Poland evaluated blood markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at different stages of treatment.
  • Findings revealed that significant increases in NLR and PLR correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS), while higher eosinophil levels linked to a lower risk of death, suggesting these markers may help predict patient responses to therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

January 2025

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka-City, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.

Purpose: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effectiveness and feasibility in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Follow-up after first-Line nivOlumab plus ipilimumab in patients with diffuse pleuRal mesotheliomA: a real-world Dutch cohort study-FLORA.

ESMO Open

January 2025

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Background: Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (dPM) is an aggressive malignancy, primarily treated with palliative systemic therapy. Since 2022, nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) has replaced chemotherapy as the standard first-line treatment for dPM in the Netherlands. Chemotherapy remains a rational second-line treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immunotherapy has been widely incorporated into the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many of these patients will experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs) without decreased efficacy. We report a retrospective analysis of the association between irAEs and efficacy outcomes from the BTCRC LUN 16-081 randomized phase 2 trial of consolidation nivolumab (N) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs N alone following chemoradiotherapy in unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!