A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Synechococcus production and grazing loss rates in nearshore tropical waters. | LitMetric

Synechococcus production and grazing loss rates in nearshore tropical waters.

Environ Monit Assess

Laboratory of Microbial Ecology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Published: March 2017

Temporal variation of Synechococcus, its production (μ) and grazing loss (g) rates were studied for 2 years at nearshore stations, i.e. Port Dickson and Port Klang along the Straits of Malacca. Synechococcus abundance at Port Dickson (0.3-2.3 × 10 cell ml) was always higher than at Port Klang (0.3-7.1 × 10 cell ml) (p < 0.001). μ ranged up to 0.98 day (0.51 ± 0.29 day), while g ranged from 0.02 to 0.31 day (0.15 ± 0.07 day) at Port Klang. At Port Dickson, μ and g averaged 0.47 ± 0.13 day (0.29-0.82 day) and 0.31 ± 0.14 day (0.13-0.63 day), respectively. Synechococcus abundance did not correlate with temperature (p > 0.25), but nutrient and light availability were important factors for their distribution. The relationship was modelled as log Synechococcus = 0.37Secchi - 0.01DIN + 4.52 where light availability (as Secchi disc depth) was a more important determinant. From a two-factorial experiment, nutrients were not significant for Synechococcus growth as in situ nutrient concentrations exceeded the threshold for saturated growth. However, light availability was important and elevated Synechococcus growth rates especially at Port Dickson (F = 5.94, p < 0.05). As for grazing loss rates, they were independent of either nutrients or light intensity (p > 0.30). In nearshore tropical waters, an estimated 69 % of Synechococcus production could be grazed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5838-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

synechococcus production
12
port dickson
12
light availability
12
production grazing
8
grazing loss
8
loss rates
8
nearshore tropical
8
tropical waters
8
port klang
8
synechococcus growth
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!