A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The impact of gender mismatching on early and late outcomes following heart transplantation. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how matching the gender of heart transplant donors and recipients affects rejection rates and clinical outcomes after the procedure.
  • The analysis involved 166 heart transplant patients, comparing outcomes between female donor-male recipient pairs and male donor-male recipient pairs, revealing significantly higher rejection rates in the female donor-male recipient group.
  • The findings indicate that gender mismatch increases the risk of both early and long-term rejection and major adverse events following heart transplantation, suggesting that gender compatibility should be considered during donor-recipient matching.

Article Abstract

Aims: The role of donor/recipient gender matching on the long-term rejection process and clinical outcomes following heart transplantation (HT) outcomes is still controversial. We aim to investigate the impact of gender matching on early and long-term outcome HT.

Methods And Results: The study population comprised 166 patients who underwent HT between 1991 and 2013 and were prospectively followed up in a tertiary referral centre. Early and late outcomes were assessed by the type of donor-recipient gender match (primary analysis: female donor-male recipient [FD-MR,  = 36] vs. male donor-male recipient [MD-MR,  = 109]). Early mortality, need for inotropic support, length of hospital stay, and major perioperative adverse events did not differ between the FD-MR and MD-MR groups. However, the FD-MR group experienced significantly higher rates of early major rejections per patient as compared with the MD-MR group (1.2 ± 1.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.8;  = 0.001), higher rates of overall major rejections (16 vs. 5.5 per 100 person years;  < 0.05), and higher rate of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (43% vs. 20%;  = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the cumulative probabilities of survival free of rejections and major adverse events were significantly higher in MD-MR group ( = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that FD-MR status was associated with >2.5-fold ( = 0.03) increase in the risk for rejections and with a >3-fold ( = 0.01) increase in the risk for major adverse events during follow-up.

Conclusions: Donor-recipient gender mismatch is a powerful independent predictor of early and late rejections and long-term major adverse events following HT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292637PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12107DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early late
12
adverse events
12
impact gender
8
late outcomes
8
outcomes heart
8
heart transplantation
8
gender matching
8
donor-recipient gender
8
donor-male recipient
8
higher rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!