Auditory phoneme discrimination (APD) is supported by both auditory and motor regions through a sensorimotor interface embedded in a fronto-temporo-parietal cortical network. However, the specific spatiotemporal organization of this network during APD with respect to different types of phonemic contrasts is still unclear. Here, we use source reconstruction, applied to event-related potentials in a group of 47 participants, to uncover a potential spatiotemporal differentiation in these brain regions during a passive and active APD task with respect to place of articulation (PoA), voicing and manner of articulation (MoA). Results demonstrate that in an early stage (50-110 ms), auditory, motor and sensorimotor regions elicit more activation during the passive and active APD task with MoA and active APD task with voicing compared to PoA. In a later stage (130-175 ms), the same auditory and motor regions elicit more activation during the APD task with PoA compared to MoA and voicing, yet only in the active condition, implying important timing differences. Degree of attention influences a frontal network during the APD task with PoA, whereas auditory regions are more affected during the APD task with MoA and voicing. Based on these findings, it can be carefully suggested that APD is supported by the integration of early activation of auditory-acoustic properties in superior temporal regions, more perpetuated for MoA and voicing, and later auditory-to-motor integration in sensorimotor areas, more perpetuated for PoA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13760-017-0761-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apd task
24
auditory motor
16
motor regions
12
active apd
12
moa voicing
12
apd
9
spatiotemporal differentiation
8
auditory phoneme
8
phoneme discrimination
8
apd supported
8

Similar Publications

Development and Validation of Quadri Condition Dichotic Double Word Test in Kannada.

Audiol Neurootol

September 2024

Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Introduction: Dichotic listening (DL) is a test where auditory stimuli are presented simultaneously to each ear. DL has clinical applications in assessing APD, schizophrenia, and brain injury. It is sensitive to hemisphere differences and has been used to study language lateralization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prison inmate samples present a high prevalence of impulsivity- and compulsivity-related behavioral problems. The Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task (PRLT) is a useful tool to assess decision-making, and we explore its associations with inmates' personality disorder (antisocial personality disorder, APD; obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, OCPD; or both) and history of drug abuse. Mixed-effects methods were used to model acquisition and reacquisition curves across PRLT, in a sample of 275 prison inmates diagnosed with OCPD, APD, or both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The study's main objective was to compare Listening Effort (LE) in children with central auditory processing disorder [(C)APD] and typically developing children in quiet and at -2 and -6 dB SNR conditions. And to determine the relationship between LE and auditory processing abilities in children with (C)APD.

Methods: The study included 30 children (15 typically developing children and 15 diagnosed with (C)APD) aged 10-12 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Speech-sound disorders (SSD) have been linked to auditory processing difficulties, and auditory processing disorders (APD) have been related to phonological awareness and literacy development. To this date, there has not been a systematic literature review investigating the results of psychophysiology and language assessments related to SSD and APD in children.

Methods: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline EBSCO, and Scopus to identify studies with children diagnosed/suspected of having APDs and SSDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Auditory Feature-based Perceptual Distance.

bioRxiv

March 2024

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

Studies comparing acoustic signals often rely on pixel-wise differences between spectrograms, as in for example mean squared error (MSE). Pixel-wise errors are not representative of perceptual sensitivity, however, and such measures can be highly sensitive to small local signal changes that may be imperceptible. In computer vision, high-level visual features extracted with convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used to calculate the fidelity of computer-generated images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!