Background: Pulpal reaction to restorative materials depends on marginal microleakage, which is a dynamic phenomenon that allows bacteria and fluids to traverse across the tooth-restoration interface. Glass-ionomer cement (GIC) exhibits low microleakage due to direct bonding to tooth structures. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) based on the similarity with tooth structure may decrease the microleakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal microleakage of a mixture of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) with micro- and nano-HAP.

Material And Methods: In this study, 30 non-carious extracted human third molar teeth were used. Standard Cl V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces. The cavities were restored in six experimental groups as follows: group 1, conventional glass-ionomer cement (CGIC); group 2, CGIC with micro-HAP; group 3, CGIC with nano-HAP; group 4, RMGI; group 5, RMGI with micro-HAP; group 6, RMGI with nano-HAP. The restorations were finished and polished. The teeth were coated with nail polish, sealed with sticky wax, thermocycled and placed in a solution of 2% basic fuchsine for 24 hours. The teeth were sectioned and microleakage was measured. Kruskal-Wallis, Man-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for data analysis (<0.05).

Results: The data analysis revealed significantly lower microleakage in groups 5 and 6 at both occlusal and gingival margins. Also in these two groups the gingival microleakage was significantly lower than occlusal margin (=0.009 and =0.001 respectively), but in groups 1(CGIC) and 3(CGIC+ nano-HAP) and 4(RMGI) the microleakage of occlusal margin were significantly lower than that of gingival margin (=0.001, =0.007 and =0.001 respectively).

Conclusions: Mixing RMGI with nano-HAP and micro-HAP resulted in lower microleakage. Glass-ionomer, micro-hydroxyapatite, microleakage, nano-hydroxyapatite.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303325PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53216DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group rmgi
12
conventional resin-modified
8
resin-modified glass-ionomer
8
marginal microleakage
8
glass-ionomer cement
8
group cgic
8
micro-hap group
8
microleakage
6
group
6
evaluation adding
4

Similar Publications

Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study.

BMC Oral Health

December 2024

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bonded substrate, zirconia surface conditioning and the interaction between them on the shear bond strength of monolithic zirconia.

Methods: Forty-eight monolithic zirconia discs were CAD-CAM fabricated and divided into two groups according to surface treatment either as milled and universal primer application (Monobond N, Ivoclar-Vivadent) (P) or sandblasting then universal primer application (Monobond N) (SP). Each main group was further divided into three test groups according to the bonded substrate: dentin (DSP, DP), composite (CSP, CP) or resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) (GSP, GP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Color Stability of Different Restorative Approaches for the Masking of Silver Diamine Fluoride after Thermal Aging.

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent

September 2024

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

Aim: The present study aims to evaluate the color stability of different masking modalities of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on extracted carious teeth after thermal aging.

Methods And Results: One hundred and eight recently extracted carious permanent teeth were used. All sample teeth had SDF applied over the carious lesion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the ion-releasing capability of three different restorative systems at the restoration/tooth interface elemental analysis using energy-dispersive X-ray technique. Additionally, micromorphological patterns of the restoration/tooth interfaces was investigated.

Materials And Methods: Eighteen freshly extracted sound human premolars were collected for the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Gloss Retention of Esthetic Restorations Following Simulated Brushing with Charcoal Oral Products: An Study.

J Contemp Dent Pract

May 2024

Department of Operative Dentistry, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates, Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9596-8739.

Aim: To assess the gloss and gloss retention of two esthetic restorative materials after brushing with a charcoal-infused toothbrush and activated charcoal toothpaste compared to their standard counterparts in all possible combinations.

Materials And Methods: In this study,104 disc-shaped specimens were prepared, 52 from each of the two materials: Beautifil II LS composite resin (Giomer) and Fuji II LC resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Specimens of each material were divided into 4 groups ( = 13) according to the tested brushing procedure: group A-standard toothbrush + standard non-whitening toothpaste (S-S), group B-standard toothbrush + activated charcoal toothpaste (S-CH), group C-charcoal-infused toothbrush + standard non-whitening toothpaste (CH-S), and group D-charcoal-infused toothbrush + activated-charcoal toothpaste (CH-CH).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent release of calcium (Ca⁺⁺) and hydroxyl (OH⁻) ions from 3 different pulp dressing materials used to cap root canal orifices in pulpotomized premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS Freshly extracted (n=40) premolars were subjected to standardized pulpotomy procedure and finally restored in 5 groups using resin-modified glass ionmmer liner (RMGI) and bonded resin composite directly against the pulp chamber's floor (Control, G2) and over 3 different orifices' capping materials - Dycal (G3), Endo Sequence root repair material (ESRRM, G4), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus (G5). Another 10 sound premolars served as the Reference group (G1).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!