A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Implant Anchorage in the Nasopalatine Canal for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla. | LitMetric

Implant Anchorage in the Nasopalatine Canal for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla.

Implant Dent

*Assistant Professor, Department of Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Irmã Arminda, Bauru, Brazil. †Departament of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Professor, Universidade São Leopoldo Mandic, R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, Campinas, Brazil. ‡Departament of Post Graduate, Student of Dentistry, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, Brazil. §Assistant Professor, Department of Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, Brazil.

Published: April 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on a clinical case where an implant was placed in the nasopalatine canal to help with the rehabilitation of an atrophic maxilla.
  • The surgical process included two stages: the first involved lifting the maxillary sinus membrane and placing xenogeneic bone, while the second involved placing seven osseointegrated implants, one of which was in the nasopalatine canal after clearing its neurovascular content.
  • After a 5-month healing period and a follow-up of 4 years, the results showed no pain, confirming that this implant method is a viable option for using implant-supported prostheses in patients with atrophic maxillae.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the clinical case of implant placement in the nasopalatine canal as an aid for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation.

Case Report: The surgical procedure was carried out in 2 stages, the first part consisted of a surgery to lift the maxillary sinus membrane associated with the xenogeneic bone placement and the second part consisted of the surgery for the implants placement, both under local anesthesia. A number of seven osseointegrated implants were placed in the maxilla, one was anchored in the nasopalatine canal region after having its neurovascular content emptied by means of the use of drill threads of the implant system. After 5 months, the implant reopening was carried out, followed by the molding, manufacturing and placement of the protocol-type prosthesis. The case has a 4-year follow-up without any painful symptomatology.

Conclusion: The implant placed in the nasopalatine canal region is a viable option to assist in the rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses in atrophic maxilla.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000562DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasopalatine canal
16
atrophic maxilla
12
consisted surgery
8
canal region
8
implant
5
implant anchorage
4
nasopalatine
4
anchorage nasopalatine
4
canal
4
canal rehabilitation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!