Objective: Morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use have increased across the nation, growing into what can only be described as an epidemic.

Setting: In Washington State between 2002 and 2004, the statewide death rate attributed to any opioid was 6.6 per 100,000 people, but between 2011 and 2013 it increased to 8.6 per 100,000 people. Pharmacies provide a unique access point for harm reduction services to patients due to their ease of accessibility in the community.

Practice Description: In development of a take-home naloxone (THN) program, there were multiple areas that needed to be considered. These included product selection, collaborative practice agreements, training format and materials, managing patient and provider expectations, partnerships, and community perception of the service.

Practice Innovation: Initial demographics from our experience of people obtaining THN showed a significant difference in the median age from other available programs in the area (57 years vs. 34, 35, and 31). These people tended to be bystanders, instead of end users of opioids, which led to redirecting marketing of our program. We provided community and group trainings for various organizations around the greater Seattle area. We have trained approximately 1400 unique individuals on how to recognize and respond to an opioid overdose, and how to administer naloxone.

Evaluation: One organization reports 20 successful overdose rescues from 99 kits (100% intranasal route) dispensed by our pharmacy (20.2% rescue rate).

Results: Since 2012 when our THN program began, we have seen growth of these programs across the state. Based on data through 2015, deaths from heroin in King County have decreased for the first time in the last 7 years, and the number of people seeking treatment for heroin addiction has increased.

Conclusion: Take-home naloxone programs can be successfully implemented into community pharmacies to increase access and awareness of opioid overdose recognition and response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

take-home naloxone
12
100000 people
8
thn program
8
opioid overdose
8
people
5
implementing take-home
4
naloxone urban
4
community
4
urban community
4
community pharmacy
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Opioid-associated fatal and non-fatal overdose rates continue to rise. Prehospital overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs are attractive harm-reduction strategies, as patients who are not transported by EMS after receiving naloxone have limited access to other interventions. This narrative summary describes our experiences with prehospital implementation of evidence-based OEND practices across Ohio as part of the HEALing Communities Study (HCS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Take home naloxone kits can reduce mortality, but we know little about how they are perceived by people with lived experience of opioid use. Provision of naloxone in the community has been shown to significantly reduce mortality from opioid overdose. Currently, this is predominantly through drug treatment support services but expanding provision through other services might be effective in increasing kit take-up and mortality reduction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Agent-Based Model of Combined Community- and Jail-Based Take-Home Naloxone Distribution.

JAMA Netw Open

December 2024

Decision and Infrastructure Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois.

Importance: Opioid-related overdose accounts for almost 80 000 deaths annually across the US. People who use drugs leaving jails are at particularly high risk for opioid-related overdose and may benefit from take-home naloxone (THN) distribution.

Objective: To estimate the population impact of THN distribution at jail release to reverse opioid-related overdose among people with opioid use disorders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the impact of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) on methamphetamine and amphetamine use among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Canada, comparing buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone.
  • Conducted over 24 weeks, data from a pan-Canadian trial highlighted that both treatments showed no significant effect on reducing methamphetamine/amphetamine use, as assessed through drug testing and self-reporting.
  • Despite methamphetamine/amphetamine use being prevalent among participants, results indicated that neither treatment method led to notable changes in their usage patterns throughout the study period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!