A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development and Validation of the Cochlear Implant Surgical Competency Assessment Instrument. | LitMetric

Development and Validation of the Cochlear Implant Surgical Competency Assessment Instrument.

Otol Neurotol

*Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida †Institute for Cochlear Implant Training, Silverthorne, Colorado ‡Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida §Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland ||Carle Clinic, Urbana, Illinois ¶House Clinic, Los Angeles, California #Boys Town Ear, Nose and Throat Institute, Omaha, Nebraska.

Published: April 2017

Objective: We present a new instrument for evaluation of cochlear implant (CI) surgical skills and review its validation process.

Methods: An instrument to assess CI surgical competency incorporated results of structured surveys of comprehensiveness sent to 30 international CI experts and US trainees. One-hundred evaluations of 28 residents, fellows, and practicing CI surgeons were completed. Surgical skills were evaluated by four experienced neurotologists (two raters per subject) using two temporal bones per subject. A training session was completed by 24 subjects between the first and second procedure. Comparison of two blinded rater's scores per subject provided information on interrater reliability. Correlation of competency scores with degree of training and with improvement after a training session provided information on construct validity.

Results: High levels of interrater reliability were confirmed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Construct validity was demonstrated by correlation of higher performance scores with increasing years of training, board certification, and fellowship training. Construct validity is also supported by improvement in scores after a CI training session as well as by acceptability surveys.

Discussion: Data indicate that this instrument is an objective, accurate, and dependable procedure-specific instrument for evaluating CI surgical competency.

Conclusion: The cochlear implant surgical competency assessment (CI-SCA) can be used to establish CI surgical competency, identify surgical skills that require remediation and demonstrate progress during training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical competency
16
cochlear implant
12
implant surgical
12
surgical skills
12
training session
12
surgical
8
competency assessment
8
instrument objective
8
interrater reliability
8
construct validity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!