AI Article Synopsis

  • Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a severe eye disease leading to vision loss, with ranibizumab and aflibercept as the key approved treatments in Europe.
  • A new individualized "treat and extend" (T&E) regimen for ranibizumab shows slight improvements in visual acuity compared to standard dosing methods, based on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 23 studies.
  • Findings indicate that while the T&E regimen has small advantages in visual gains over other options at 12 and 24 months, overall effectiveness between all dosing regimens remains similar and statistically insignificant.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a chronic eye condition that causes severe deterioration of vision and ultimately blindness. Two vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are approved for nAMD treatment in Europe: ranibizumab and aflibercept. The European license for ranibizumab was updated with an individualized "treat and extend" (T&E) regimen, which involves more proactive treatment based on changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and/or anatomical outcomes. The aim of this publication is to compare the efficacy of the ranibizumab T&E regimen with other approved dosing regimens for nAMD on the basis of outcomes identified from a systematic review and subsequent NMA.

Methods: Following a systematic search of publications, to identify relevant studies, a repeated-measures network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of ranibizumab T&E versus approved dosing regimens of ranibizumab and aflibercept. The analysis focused on licensed treatment regimens for nAMD. We examined mean change from baseline in BCVA on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.

Results: The systematic literature review identified 22,949 records, of which 23 studies were included in the NMA. At 12 months, the ranibizumab T&E dosing regimen vs ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) was associated with small differences in change in BCVA, between 1.86 letter gain at 12 months and 2.35 letter gain at 24 months. A similar difference was observed in the aflibercept dosing regimen versus ranibizumab T&E ; 1.94 letter gain at 12 months and 3.31 letter gain at 24 months. All doses of ranibizumab and aflibercept showed similar effectiveness, and the differences between treatment options were not significant.

Conclusion: This study used novel repeated-measures NMA to synthesize efficacy results when treatment effects were reported at multiple follow-up times. This repeated-measures NMA suggests that treating patients with the ranibizumab T&E regimen yields similar effectiveness compared to other approved ranibizumab and aflibercept dosing regimens for nAMD treatment.

Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Surrey, UK.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350194PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0484-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ranibizumab t&e
20
ranibizumab aflibercept
16
letter gain
16
ranibizumab
12
t&e regimen
12
dosing regimens
12
regimens namd
12
effectiveness ranibizumab
8
systematic review
8
network meta-analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!