Delphi Survey of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery Research Priorities in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

J Nurs Scholarsh

Alpha Zeta, Anna C. Maxwell Professor of Nursing Research, Associate Dean for Nursing Research School of Nursing, Professor of Epidemiology, Editor, American Journal of Infection Control; Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Published: March 2017

Purpose: As the shortage of nurses and midwives is expected to worsen in the Eastern Mediterranean region concomitantly with a growing focus on achievement of universal health coverage, nurses and midwives are expected to fill major gaps in health care. Hence, the need for a solid evidence base for nursing practice and a clear direction for clinical nursing research are paramount. Therefore, a Delphi survey was conducted to determine clinical (research focused on patient outcomes) nursing and midwifery priorities for research within this region.

Design: A Delphi survey, using iterative rounds of an online survey of regional clinical nursing and midwifery research experts, was conducted between January and April 2016.

Methods: Consensus was determined by percentage agreement on level of priority for topics as determined by participants. Additionally, results were compared between countries within the region by income and mortality levels using Kendall's tau.

Findings: Critical research topics were focused on public/community/primary care as well as emergency preparedness for disasters, and these priorities are well aligned with gaps in the literature for this region. There were statistically significant differences between priority level and country mortality group for geriatrics, self-management of disease, and sexually transmitted infections.

Conclusions: Critical research priorities should focus on population-based health topics. Between-country differences should be analyzed further. A clinical research database for the region may help improve research access for nurses and midwives.

Clinical Relevance: Practicing nurses and midwives lack extensive evidence (including culturally relevant evidence) on which to practice. Increasing research in areas identified in this survey may improve patient outcomes and quality of care regionally.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12280DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delphi survey
12
clinical nursing
12
nursing midwifery
12
nurses midwives
12
midwifery priorities
8
eastern mediterranean
8
mediterranean region
8
midwives expected
8
patient outcomes
8
clinical
5

Similar Publications

How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.

Syst Rev

January 2025

Department of Research Methods in Health Promotion and Prevention, Institute for Health Sciences, University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Straße 200, Schwäbisch Gmünd, 73525, Germany.

Background: Delphi studies are primarily used in the health sciences to find consensus. They inform clinical practice and influence structures, processes, and framework conditions of healthcare. The practical research-how Delphi studies are conducted-has seldom been discussed methodologically or documented systematically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: The role of the healthcare system in the provision, maintenance, and promotion of public health is associated with handling healthcare complaints. This notion as the principle of accountability requires the authorities' attention. This study aimed to develop the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) in Iran.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Mentoring plays a crucial role in career development, particularly for black and minoritised ethnic (BME) professionals. However, existing literature lacks clarity on the impact of mentoring and how best to deliver for career success. This study aimed to ascertain perceptions and build consensus on what is important in mentoring for BME healthcare professionals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Cocreation, a collaborative process of key interested partners working alongside researchers, is fundamental to community-engaged research. However, the field of community-engaged research is currently grappling with a significant gap: the lack of a pragmatic and validated measure to assess the quality of this process. This protocol addresses this significant gap by developing and testing a pragmatic cocreation measure with diverse community and research partners involved in participatory health-related research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!