Aims: AT9283 is used to treat patients with solid tumours and patients with leukaemia. However, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for children with leukaemia remains unknown due to early termination of the Phase I trial. The aim of this study was to develop a population model of AT9283 to describe the pharmacokinetics in adults and children and to estimate the MTD in children with leukaemia.

Methods: Data from Phase I dose-escalation studies in adults and children were used to build a population pharmacokinetic model (NONMEM v7.3). Potential covariates investigated included body weight, body surface area (BSA), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), age and sex. Model-derived area under the concentration-time curve was used to investigate the relationship between dose and exposure in adults and children.

Results: The plasma concentrations of AT9283 (n = 1770) from 92 patients (53 adults, 39 children) were used to build a two-compartment model with all pharmacokinetic parameters scaled using body weight. Renal function (GFR), but not BSA, was a significant covariate for the clearance of AT9283. In children with leukaemia (median weight 16 kg), a flat dose of 500 mg 72 h provided similar drug exposures at the MTD as the adult population. The estimated MTD for children with leukaemia, therefore, is 30 mg kg  72 h .

Conclusion: For adults, GFR was a significant predictor of clearance, whilst body-weight based dosing was more useful than BSA in determining the drug exposure in children. The MTD was estimated to be 30 mg kg  72 h children with leukaemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5510070PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13260DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

children leukaemia
20
adults children
16
mtd children
12
children
11
population pharmacokinetic
8
pharmacokinetic model
8
model at9283
8
maximum tolerated
8
tolerated dose
8
children build
8

Similar Publications

Eosinophilia is rare in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In this report, we present a case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with marked eosinophilia, whose diagnosis was delayed because of clonorchiasis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mutations in the genes , , and cause three clinically overlapping thrombocytopenias characterized by a predisposition to hematological neoplasms. The gene, which encodes a protein involved in protein-protein interactions, is downregulated by RUNX1 during megakaryopoiesis. Mutations in 5'UTR of ANKRD26, leading to ANKRD26-RT, disrupt this regulation, resulting in the persistent expression of ANKRD26, which leads to impaired platelet biogenesis and an increased risk of leukemia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-calicheamicin conjugate with striking efficacy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, there is wide inter-patient variability in treatment response, and the genetic basis of this variation remains largely unknown. Using a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we discovered the loss of DNTT as a primary driver of InO resistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

DNA Aptamer-Polymer Conjugates for Selective Targeting of Integrin α4β1 T-Lineage Cancers.

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces

January 2025

Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.

Selective therapeutic targeting of T-cell malignancies is difficult due to the shared lineage between healthy and malignant T cells. Current front-line chemotherapy for these cancers is largely nonspecific, resulting in frequent cases of relapsed/refractory disease. The development of targeting approaches for effectively treating T-cell leukemia and lymphoma thus remains a critical goal for the oncology field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We evaluated the prognostic and therapeutic significance of measurable residual disease (MRD) during remission induction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. In the CCCG-ALL-2015 protocol, 7640 patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups based on clinical and genetic features. Final risk classification was determined by MRD assessed via flow cytometry on Days 19 and 46 of remission induction, with additional intensified chemotherapy for Day 19 MRD ≥1%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!